Uganda Cancer Institute, Upper Mulago Hill Road, Kampala, Uganda.
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0211648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211648. eCollection 2019.
Despite the importance of platelet transfusions in treatment of hematologic cancer patients, the optimal platelet count threshold for prophylactic transfusion is unknown in sub-Saharan Africa.
We followed patients admitted to the Uganda Cancer Institute with a hematological malignancy in 3 sequential 4-month time-periods using incrementally lower thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion: platelet counts ≤ 30 x 109/L in period 1, ≤ 20 x 109/L in period 2, and ≤ 10 x 109/L in period 3. Clinically significant bleeding was defined as WHO grade ≥ 2 bleeding. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to compare the frequency of clinically significant bleeding and platelet transfusions by study period, adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, chemotherapy, baseline platelet count, and baseline hemoglobin.
Overall, 188 patients were enrolled. The median age was 22 years (range 1-80). Platelet transfusions were given to 42% of patients in period 1, 55% in period 2, and 45% in period 3. These transfusions occurred on 8% of days in period 1, 12% in period 2, and 8% in period 3. In adjusted models, period 3 had significantly fewer transfusions than period 1 (RR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p = 0.01) and period 2 (RR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.7; p<0.001). Eighteen patients (30%) had clinically significant bleeding on at least one day in period 1, 23 (30%) in period 2, and 15 (23%) in period 3. Clinically significant bleeding occurred on 8% of patient-days in period 1, 9% in period 2, and 5% in period 3 (adjusted p = 0.41). Thirteen (21%) patients died in period 1, 15 (22%) in period 2, and 11 (19%) in period 3 (adjusted p = 0.96).
Lowering the threshold for platelet transfusion led to fewer transfusions and did not change the incidence of clinically significant bleeding or mortality, suggesting that a threshold of 10 x 109/L platelets, used in resource-rich countries, may be implemented as a safe level for transfusions in sub-Saharan Africa.
尽管血小板输注在治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中具有重要意义,但在撒哈拉以南非洲,预防性输注血小板的最佳血小板计数阈值仍不清楚。
我们连续三个 4 个月的时间间隔,在乌干达癌症研究所收治患有血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者中使用递增的预防性血小板输注阈值:第 1 期血小板计数≤30×109/L,第 2 期血小板计数≤20×109/L,第 3 期血小板计数≤10×109/L。临床显著出血定义为世界卫生组织(WHO)分级≥2 级出血。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)比较研究期间临床显著出血和血小板输注的频率,调整年龄、性别、癌症类型、化疗、基线血小板计数和基线血红蛋白。
共有 188 名患者入组。中位年龄为 22 岁(范围 1-80 岁)。第 1 期有 42%的患者接受了血小板输注,第 2 期有 55%的患者接受了血小板输注,第 3 期有 45%的患者接受了血小板输注。这些输注发生在第 1 期的 8%的天数,第 2 期的 12%的天数和第 3 期的 8%的天数。在调整模型中,第 3 期的输注明显少于第 1 期(RR=0.6,95%CI 0.4-0.9;p=0.01)和第 2 期(RR=0.5,95%CI 0.4-0.7;p<0.001)。第 1 期有 18 名(30%)患者至少有一天出现临床显著出血,第 2 期有 23 名(30%)患者,第 3 期有 15 名(23%)患者。第 1 期临床显著出血发生在 8%的患者天数,第 2 期为 9%,第 3 期为 5%(调整后的 p=0.41)。第 1 期有 13 名(21%)患者死亡,第 2 期有 15 名(22%)患者死亡,第 3 期有 11 名(19%)患者死亡(调整后的 p=0.96)。
降低血小板输注阈值导致输注减少,且并未改变临床显著出血或死亡率,这表明资源丰富国家使用的 10×109/L 血小板阈值可作为撒哈拉以南非洲安全输注水平。