Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, One Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jun;49(6):2304-2319. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03913-5.
U.S. guidelines for detecting autism emphasize screening and also incorporate clinical judgment. However, most research focuses on the former. Among 1,654 children participating in a multi-stage screening protocol for autism, we used mixed methods to evaluate: (1) the effectiveness of a clinical decision rule that encouraged further assessment based not only on positive screening results, but also on parent or provider concern, and (2) the influence of shared decision-making on screening administration. Referrals based on concern alone were cost-effective in the current study, and reported concerns were stronger predictors than positive screens of time-to-complete referrals. Qualitative analyses suggest a dynamic relationship between parents' concerns, providers' concerns, and screening results that is central to facilitating shared decision-making and influencing diagnostic assessment.
美国自闭症检测指南强调筛查,并纳入临床判断。然而,大多数研究都集中在前一种方法上。在参与自闭症多阶段筛查方案的 1654 名儿童中,我们使用混合方法评估了以下内容:(1)一种临床决策规则的有效性,该规则不仅根据阳性筛查结果,还根据家长或提供者的担忧,鼓励进一步评估;(2) 共享决策对筛查管理的影响。仅基于担忧的转介在本研究中具有成本效益,而且报告的担忧比阳性筛查更能预测转介完成时间。定性分析表明,父母的担忧、提供者的担忧和筛查结果之间存在一种动态关系,这是促进共享决策和影响诊断评估的核心。