Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎:是否具有成本效益?

Adalimumab for non-infectious uveitis: is it cost-effective?

机构信息

ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;103(11):1633-1638. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312756. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Uveitis is inflammation inside the eye. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with current practice (immunosuppressants and systemic corticosteroids) in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior or panuveitis and to identify areas for future research.

METHODS

A Markov model was built to estimate costs and benefits of the interventions. Systematic reviews were performed to identify the available relevant clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence. Data collected in two key randomised controlled trials (VISUAL I and VISUAL II) were used to estimate the interventions' effectiveness compared with the trials' comparator arms (placebo plus limited current practice (LCP)). The analysis was performed from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Costs were calculated based on standard UK sources.

RESULTS

The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of adalimumab versus LCP for the base case are £92 600 and £318 075 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for active and inactive uveitis, respectively. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER varied from £15 579 to £120 653 and £35 642 to £800 775 per QALY for active and inactive uveitis.

CONCLUSION

The estimated ICERs of adalimumab versus LCP are above generally accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in the UK. Adalimumab may be more cost-effective in patients with active uveitis at greater risk of blindness. However, there is an unmet need for additional primary data to provide more reliable estimates in several important areas, including effectiveness of adalimumab versus current practice (instead of LCP), incidence of long-term blindness, adalimumab effectiveness in avoiding blindness, and rates and time to remission while on adalimumab.

摘要

背景/目的:葡萄膜炎是眼内炎症。我们的目标是评估阿达木单抗与当前治疗方案(免疫抑制剂和全身皮质类固醇)相比,在非感染性中间、后部或全葡萄膜炎患者中的成本效益,并确定未来研究的领域。

方法

建立了一个马尔可夫模型来估计干预措施的成本和效益。进行了系统评价,以确定现有相关的临床和成本效益证据。使用两项关键随机对照试验(VISUAL I 和 VISUAL II)中收集的数据,来估计与试验对照臂(安慰剂加有限的当前治疗方案(LCP))相比,干预措施的有效性。分析是从英国国家医疗服务体系和个人社会服务角度进行的。成本是根据英国标准来源计算的。

结果

阿达木单抗与 LCP 相比,活跃性和非活跃性葡萄膜炎的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的 92600 英镑和 318075 英镑。在敏感性分析中,ICER 在活跃性和非活跃性葡萄膜炎中分别从每 QALY 的 15579 英镑到 120653 英镑和从 35642 英镑到 800775 英镑不等。

结论

阿达木单抗与 LCP 相比,其增量成本效益比(ICER)高于英国普遍接受的成本效益阈值。阿达木单抗在失明风险较高的活动性葡萄膜炎患者中可能更具成本效益。然而,在几个重要领域仍存在未满足的需求,需要更多的原始数据来提供更可靠的估计,包括阿达木单抗与当前治疗方案(而不是 LCP)的疗效、长期失明的发生率、阿达木单抗在避免失明方面的疗效,以及阿达木单抗治疗时的缓解率和时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验