Suppr超能文献

评估和量化来自学龄前儿童叙事的安全基地脚本:验证性测试。

Assessing and quantifying the secure base script from narratives produced by preschool age children: justification and validation tests.

机构信息

a Human Development and Family Studies , Auburn University , Auburn , AL , USA.

b Human Development and Family Studies , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.

出版信息

Attach Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;21(3):225-237. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1575546. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Abstract

Building on aframework presented by Bretherton and associates, Waters and associates argued that interaction sequences relevant to children's access to and use of asecure base for exploration during infancy/toddlerhood become internalized as script-like representations. For adults, these scripted representations are readily assessed using word-prompt lists d to elicit attachment relevant narratives. However, this method is not appropriate during early childhood. Waters and associates used stories from Bretherton's Attachment Story Completion Task for this purpose. However, the method they used to score secure base script use is not efficient for larger samples (e.g. over 50), and new approaches for scoring have been designed. We describe two approaches to story selection and scoring for access to and use of the secure base script. The two scoring methods show substantial and significant overlap and also have significant associations with other methods of measuring attachment security during early childhood.

摘要

基于 Bretherton 及其同事提出的框架,Waters 及其同事认为,与儿童在婴儿期/学步期获得和使用安全基地进行探索相关的互动序列会被内化,成为类似脚本的表示。对于成年人,使用单词提示列表 d 可以很容易地评估这些脚本化的表示,以引出与依恋相关的叙述。然而,这种方法在幼儿期并不适用。Waters 及其同事为此目的使用了 Bretherton 的《依恋故事完成任务》中的故事。然而,他们用于评分安全基地脚本使用的方法对于较大的样本(例如超过 50 个)效率不高,并且已经设计了新的评分方法。我们描述了两种用于选择和评分访问和使用安全基地脚本的故事的方法。这两种评分方法显示出实质性和显著的重叠,并且与在幼儿期衡量依恋安全性的其他方法也有显著的关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验