a Department of Human Development & Family Studies , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.
b Department of Human Development and Family Studies , Auburn University , Auburn , AL , USA.
Attach Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;21(3):238-252. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1575547. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Associations between attachment security, assessed as a secure base script (SBS), and teachers' social competence ratings were examined in two samples (one from the Midwest region and the other from the Southern region of the United States). Consistent with previous reports, significant associations between domains were obtained in both samples and after combining the two samples, r = .33, p < .001. The associations remained significant when child sex, age, and verbal intelligence were controlled. Findings are discussed with reference to relations between SBS scores and the covariates. Regarding sex differences, an existing literature suggests that girls, compared with boys, may be advantaged with respect to skills that could support higher scores on the task used to assess secure base scripts. In both samples, teachers rated girls as somewhat higher on scales of social competence and controlling for sex reduced the magnitude of associations between SBS and social competence, but the results remained significant in all tests.
在两个样本（一个来自美国中西部地区，另一个来自南部地区）中，考察了依恋安全性（评估为安全基地脚本（SBS））与教师社会能力评定之间的关联。与之前的报告一致，两个样本中以及合并两个样本后，各个领域之间均存在显著关联，r=0.33，p<0.001。当控制儿童的性别、年龄和语言智力时，关联仍然显著。研究结果与 SBS 评分与协变量之间的关系进行了讨论。关于性别差异，现有文献表明，与男孩相比，女孩可能在支持评估安全基地脚本任务中获得更高分数的技能方面具有优势。在两个样本中，教师对女孩的社会能力评定略高，在控制性别后，SBS 与社会能力之间的关联程度降低，但在所有测试中结果仍然显著。
