Rosenfeld L E
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cardiol Clin. 1988 Aug;6(3):437-48.
Device therapy is becoming increasingly important in the management of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Currently, antitachycardia pacemakers and endovascular cardioverters are available on an experimental basis, while the AICD is commercially available. Although the first two devices are much easier to implant, their use is limited by their potential to accelerate a tachycardia or cause it to degenerate to ventricular fibrillation, and their lack of backup high energy defibrillation capabilities. The majority of patients receiving antitachycardia devices will require concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy and all three devices have unique interactions with such drugs. Extensive evaluation and careful preimplantation patient selection are essential if device therapy is to be successful. The antitachycardia device of the future, however, will be easily implantable and much more sophisticated, combining features of all three of these devices as well as the increased flexibility provided by extensive programming and telemetry capabilities.
器械治疗在危及生命的室性心律失常患者管理中变得越来越重要。目前,抗心动过速起搏器和血管内心脏复律器在实验基础上可用,而植入式心律转复除颤器(AICD)已商业化。尽管前两种器械植入起来容易得多,但它们的使用受到加速心动过速或使其恶化为心室颤动的可能性以及缺乏备用高能除颤能力的限制。大多数接受抗心动过速器械治疗的患者将需要同时进行抗心律失常治疗,并且所有这三种器械与这类药物都有独特的相互作用。如果器械治疗要取得成功,广泛评估和仔细的植入前患者选择至关重要。然而,未来的抗心动过速器械将易于植入且更加精密复杂,结合了这三种器械的所有特性以及广泛编程和遥测功能提供的更高灵活性。