Gerckens U, Manz M, Funke H D, Kirchhoff P G, Lüderitz B
Z Kardiol. 1987 Apr;76(4):211-6.
For the electrotherapy of refractory ventricular tachycardia the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) and antitachycardia pacemaker are available. The long-term use of antitachycardia pacing is still limited by the potential risk of acceleration to ventricular fibrillation. To combine the advantages of antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation, we evaluated the use of an antitachycardia pacemaker with the automatic defibrillator. The AICD was implanted in 13 patients with a mean age of 62 years (from 46 to 75 years); six of them with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (170 +/- 16 per minute) which could reliably be terminated by overdrive pacing, received also an antitachycardia pacemaker (Tachylog 651). The underlying cardiac disease was coronary heart disease in 11 patients and cardiomyopathy in 2 cases. All patients had survived 1 to 6 cardiac arrests and had not responded to 6 +/- 1.5 antiarrhythmic drugs. For antitachycardia pacing we used burst stimulation with 4 to 6 stimuli and coupling intervals from 260 to 300 ms. During the follow-up period of 12 +/- 2 months, 83% of 744 tachycardias could be terminated by burst stimulation, according to the diagnostic data of the pulse generator. If the pacemaker failed to terminate or in case of acceleration (three patients), the automatic countershock of the AICD (5-42 per patient) restored sinus rhythm. In seven patients with high rate tachycardia, 2 to 69 AICD discharges occurred. No patient died suddenly, but three died due to underlying disease and one because of a pneumonia postoperatively. Future antitachycardia devices should be flexible with regard to detection and termination modes, combining antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation.
对于难治性室性心动过速的电疗法,可使用自动植入式心脏复律除颤器(AICD)和抗心动过速起搏器。抗心动过速起搏的长期使用仍受到加速至心室颤动的潜在风险的限制。为了将抗心动过速起搏的优点与备用除颤相结合,我们评估了抗心动过速起搏器与自动除颤器的联合使用。13例平均年龄62岁(46至75岁)的患者植入了AICD;其中6例复发性室性心动过速(每分钟170±16次)患者,其心动过速可通过超速起搏可靠终止,他们还接受了抗心动过速起搏器(Tachylog 651)。11例患者的基础心脏病为冠心病,2例为心肌病。所有患者均经历过1至6次心脏骤停,且对6±1.5种抗心律失常药物无反应。对于抗心动过速起搏,我们使用4至6次刺激的短阵猝发刺激,耦合间期为260至300毫秒。根据脉冲发生器的诊断数据,在12±2个月的随访期内,744次心动过速中有83%可通过短阵猝发刺激终止。如果起搏器未能终止心动过速或出现加速情况(3例患者),AICD的自动电击(每位患者5至42次)可恢复窦性心律。7例高频率心动过速患者发生了2至69次AICD电击。无患者突然死亡,但3例因基础疾病死亡,1例术后死于肺炎。未来的抗心动过速装置在检测和终止模式方面应具有灵活性,将抗心动过速起搏与备用除颤相结合。