Saba Luca, Ajossa Silvia, Ledda Giuseppe, Balestrieri Antonella, Schirru Federica, De Cecco Carlo Nicola, Suri Jasjit S, Melis Gian Benedetto, Lavra Francesco, Guerriero Stefano
1 Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) , Cagliari , Italy.
2 Department of Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) , Cagliari , Italy.
Br J Radiol. 2019 Apr;92(1096):20180548. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180548. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
: Some recent studies have explored how the experience in the observers change their performance in the endometriosis detection using MRI but the effects of the clinical information remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the clinical information in the diagnostic confidence in the MRI diagnosis of endometriosis.
: Institutional Review Board was obtained. This study is compliant to STARD method. 80 patients (mean age 32 years; range 19 - 46 years) who had undergone MRI study and surgery for suspected endometriosis were retrospectively evaluated. MRI exams were performed with a 1.5 T scanner and the following five locations were assessed: ovary, anterior compartment, vaginal fornix, utero-sacral ligaments, and Rectum\Sigmoid\Pouch of Douglas. Data sets were evaluated twice on a 5-point scale by four radiologists with different level of expertise; the first time blinded to the clinical information and the second time, after 3 months together with the clinical chart. Statistical analysis included receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the Cohen weighted test and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, LR+ and LR-.
: A total of 140 localization of endometriosis (47 endometriomas and 93 endometriotic nodules) were found. The pairwise comparison demonstrated that in all cases the presence of clinical information improved the Az value. The concordance analysis indicated a mixed pattern from modest agreement (weighted κ value 0.556 for anterior compartment) to excellent agreement values (weighted κ value 0.867 for ovarian endometriomas).
: The results of our study suggest that clinical information is useful in diagnosing endometriosis in general anterior compartment, but not in other locations. Less experienced radiologists (resident) may benefit from it at utero-sacral ligaments or Rectum\Sigmoid\Pouch of Douglas.
: In this era of sometimes indiscriminate use of diagnostic methods, it is important to emphasis the context for interpretation of diagnostic results. Our paper confirms that clinical information is useful in diagnosing endometriosis.
近期一些研究探讨了观察者的经验如何改变他们使用磁共振成像(MRI)检测子宫内膜异位症的表现,但临床信息的影响仍不确定。本研究的目的是评估临床信息对MRI诊断子宫内膜异位症时诊断信心的影响。
获得机构审查委员会批准。本研究符合STARD方法。对80例因疑似子宫内膜异位症接受MRI检查和手术的患者(平均年龄32岁;范围19 - 46岁)进行回顾性评估。使用1.5T扫描仪进行MRI检查,并评估以下五个部位:卵巢、前间隙、阴道穹窿、子宫骶韧带以及直肠/乙状结肠/Douglas陷凹。由四位专业水平不同的放射科医生对数据集进行两次5分制评估;第一次在不知道临床信息的情况下进行,第二次在3个月后结合临床病历进行。统计分析包括受试者操作特征曲线分析、Cohen加权检验以及敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度、阳性似然比和阴性似然比。
共发现140处子宫内膜异位症定位(47个子宫内膜瘤和93个子宫内膜异位结节)。成对比较表明,在所有病例中,临床信息的存在提高了Az值。一致性分析显示出从适度一致(前间隙加权κ值为0.556)到极好一致值(卵巢子宫内膜瘤加权κ值为0.867)的混合模式。
我们的研究结果表明,临床信息在诊断一般前间隙的子宫内膜异位症时有用,但在其他部位则不然。经验较少的放射科医生(住院医生)在子宫骶韧带或直肠/乙状结肠/Douglas陷凹处可能会从中受益。
在这个有时不加区分使用诊断方法的时代,强调诊断结果解释的背景很重要。我们的论文证实了临床信息在诊断子宫内膜异位症时是有用的。