Suppr超能文献

利用磁共振检测卵巢和深部子宫内膜异位症的学习曲线:与手术结果的比较。

Learning curve in the detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis by using Magnetic Resonance: comparison with surgical results.

机构信息

Department of Science of the Images, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, s.s. 554 Monserrato (Cagliari) 09045, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determining if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) accuracy in diagnosing endometriosis is related to radiologist's expertise.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study is compliant to STARD method. Thirty patients (mean age 34; range 21-45 years) who had undergone MRI study for suspected endometriosis underwent surgery were retrospectively evaluated. MRI at 1.5T was performed with SE and TSE sequences, T1 and T2-weighted with and without fat suppression. Four localizations were analyzed: ovary, uterosacral ligaments (USL), vaginal fornix and Rectum\Sigma\Douglas (R.S.D.). One radiologist evaluated each dataset; sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, accuracy, LR+ and LR- were calculated according to the surgical results (first analysis). Dataset were then re-analyzed 12 months (second analysis) and 24 months (third analysis) later. McNemar test was applied to determine differences between the three analysis.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the ovary at the first analysis were 88.9%, 87% and 88%, at the second 92.6%, 87% and 90% whereas at the third 92.6%, 91.3% and 92%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the USLs at the first analysis were 62.5%, 76.9% and 70%, at the second 72%, 80.8% and 76% whereas at the third 80%, 84.6% and 82%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the vaginal fornix at the first analysis were 63.2%, 64.5% and 64%, at the second 73.7%, 77.4% and 76% whereas at the third 73.7%, 83.9% and 80%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the R.S.D. at the first analysis were 39.1%, 81.5% and 62%, at the second 62.5%, 85.2% and 76% whereas at the third 73.9%, 88.9% and 82%. McNemar test indicated a significant statistical difference in sensitivity in detecting nodules of endometriosis in R.S.D. between first and third analysis (p=0.0215). The mean review time decreased (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of MRI in diagnosing endometriosis increased with radiologist's expertise and the improvement was statistically significant in determining RSD involvement.

摘要

目的

确定磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断子宫内膜异位症中的准确性是否与放射科医生的专业知识有关。

方法和材料

所有患者均获得书面知情同意。本研究符合 STARD 方法。回顾性分析了 30 名(平均年龄 34 岁;范围 21-45 岁)因疑似子宫内膜异位症接受 MRI 检查并接受手术的患者。在 1.5T 上进行 MRI 检查,采用 SE 和 TSE 序列,T1 和 T2 加权,有和无脂肪抑制。分析了四个部位:卵巢、子宫骶韧带(USL)、阴道穹窿和直肠\西格玛\道格拉斯(R.S.D.)。一位放射科医生评估了每个数据集;根据手术结果计算了敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV、准确性、LR+和 LR-(第一次分析)。然后在 12 个月(第二次分析)和 24 个月(第三次分析)后重新分析数据集。应用 McNemar 检验确定三次分析之间的差异。

结果

第一次分析时,卵巢的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 88.9%、87%和 88%,第二次为 92.6%、87%和 90%,第三次为 92.6%、91.3%和 92%。第一次分析时,USL 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 62.5%、76.9%和 70%,第二次为 72%、80.8%和 76%,第三次为 80%、84.6%和 82%。第一次分析时,阴道穹窿的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 63.2%、64.5%和 64%,第二次为 73.7%、77.4%和 76%,第三次为 73.7%、83.9%和 80%。第一次分析时,R.S.D.的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 39.1%、81.5%和 62%,第二次为 62.5%、85.2%和 76%,第三次为 73.9%、88.9%和 82%。McNemar 检验表明,R.S.D.中检测子宫内膜异位症结节的敏感性在第一次和第三次分析之间存在显著的统计学差异(p=0.0215)。审查时间的平均值降低(p=0.0001)。

结论

MRI 诊断子宫内膜异位症的准确性随着放射科医生专业知识的提高而提高,在确定 RSD 受累方面的提高具有统计学意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验