Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center and Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 7;17(2):e3000112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000112. eCollection 2019 Feb.
The mirror mark test has encouraged a binary view of self-awareness according to which a few species possess this capacity whereas others do not. Given how evolution works, however, we need a more gradualist model of the various ways in which animals construe a self and respond to mirrors. The recent study on cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus) by Kohda and colleagues highlights this need by presenting results that, due to ambiguous behavior and the use of physically irritating marks, fall short of mirror self-recognition. The study suggests an intermediate level of mirror understanding, closer to that of monkeys than hominids.
镜像标记测试鼓励了一种自我意识的二元观点,即少数物种拥有这种能力,而其他物种则没有。然而,考虑到进化的运作方式,我们需要一个更渐进的模型,来描述动物构建自我并对镜子做出反应的各种方式。Kohda 及其同事最近对清洁濑鱼(Labroides dimidiatus)的研究通过呈现由于行为模棱两可以及使用物理刺激标记而未能达到镜像自我识别的结果,突出了这种需求。该研究表明存在一种中间水平的镜像理解,更接近猴子而非人类。