Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery , New York , NY , USA.
Phys Sportsmed. 2019 Sep;47(3):270-274. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1580913. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
: Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA) has been shown to be successful in restoring knee function and quality of life in patients with the isolated patellofemoral disease. Patient satisfaction has been suggested as an indicator of the quality of elective orthopedic operations, although there remains no standardized method to collect and evaluate satisfaction. The present study offers a systematic review of the available literature concerning patient satisfaction following PFA to assess common methodologies for reporting patient satisfaction. : A query of the Medline database produced 116 articles that were reviewed for inclusion in the review. The following inclusion criteria were used to identify suitable articles: English language, clinical outcomes study related to PFA, and patient-reported satisfaction as an outcome measure. : Seven studies met inclusion criteria and were eligible for review. The highest level of evidence was level-III. The study publication dates ranged from 2009 to 2016, with six published in 2015 & 2016. In total, 320 PFAs were performed on 267 patients. Four articles reported the proportion of included patients who had previous knee surgeries (range: 20-60%). Three studies used ordinal scales to rate patient satisfaction. Four studies (57.1%) reported the numeric proportion of patients satisfied following PFA, which ranged from 76% to 96.5%. Two studies used Visual Analog Scale methods. For these two studies, one of them reported the mean satisfaction score as 7.5/10, and the other reported a median of 90/100. : The available literature on patient satisfaction after PFA was found to be limited, with low-quality evidence and variable methodology.
髌股关节成形术(PFA)已被证明可成功恢复孤立髌股疾病患者的膝关节功能和生活质量。患者满意度已被认为是选择矫形手术质量的指标,尽管目前尚无收集和评估满意度的标准化方法。本研究对 PFA 后患者满意度的现有文献进行了系统评价,以评估报告患者满意度的常用方法。
对 Medline 数据库进行查询,产生了 116 篇文章,对其进行了审查,以确定是否符合纳入标准。使用以下纳入标准来确定合适的文章:英语,与 PFA 相关的临床结果研究,以及患者报告的满意度作为结局指标。
符合纳入标准并符合审查条件的有 7 项研究。最高证据水平为三级。研究的出版日期从 2009 年到 2016 年不等,其中 6 篇发表于 2015 年和 2016 年。共有 267 名患者的 320 例 PFA 进行了手术。有 4 篇文章报告了纳入患者中有既往膝关节手术史的比例(范围:20-60%)。有 3 项研究使用等级量表来评估患者满意度。有 4 项研究(57.1%)报告了 PFA 后患者满意度的数值比例,范围从 76%到 96.5%。有 2 项研究使用了视觉模拟量表方法。对于这两项研究,其中一项报告了平均满意度评分为 7.5/10,另一项报告中位数为 90/100。
发现关于 PFA 后患者满意度的现有文献数量有限,证据质量低,方法也各不相同。