Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Services in Health Economics (SHE), Brussels, Belgium.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1069-6.
To estimate the additional impact of coping and of being dependent on caregivers, over and above the large effects of disability on utility after ischemic stroke.
A total of 539 patients were recruited into an observational, retrospective study when returning for a check-up between 3 and 36 months after an ischemic stroke. Patients' modified Rankin Scale (mRS), dependency on caregivers, the Brandtstädter and Renner Coping questionnaire (with summary scores: Tenacity of Goal Pursuit (TGP) and Flexible Goal Adjustment (FGA) coping styles), EQ-5D-3 L and co-morbidities were evaluated.
In multivariable regression, greater disability (mRS) resulted in large utility losses, between 0.06 for mRS 1 to 0.65 for mRS 5 (p < 0.0001). Dependency on caregivers caused an additional dis-utility of 0.104 (p = 0.0006) which varied by mRS (0.044, 0.060, 0.083, 0.115, 0.150 and 0.173 for mRS 0-5). The effect of coping on utility varied by coping style, by the disability level of the patient and by his or her dependency on caregivers. FGA coping was associated with additional increases in utility (p < 0.0001) over and above the effect of disability and dependency, whereas TGA had no significant impact. FGA coping was associated with larger utility changes among more disabled patients (0.018 to 0.105 additional utility, for mRS 0 to mRS 5 respectively). Dependent patients had more to gain from FGA coping than patients who function independently of caregivers: utility gains were between 0.049 and 0.072 for moderate to high levels of FGA coping. In contrast, the same positive evolution in FGA coping resulted in 0.039 and 0.057 utility gain among independent patients. Finally, we found that important stroke risk factors and co-morbidities, such as diabetes and atrial fibrillation, were not predictors of EQ-5D utility in a multivariable setting.
This study suggests that treatment strategies targeting flexible coping styles and decreasing dependency on caregivers may lead to significant gains in quality of life above and beyond treatment strategies that solely target disability.
在缺血性卒中后 3 至 36 个月进行复查时,招募了 539 名患者参加一项观察性、回顾性研究,以评估应对策略和对照顾者的依赖对效用的额外影响,这些影响超过残疾对效用的巨大影响。
评估患者的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)、对照顾者的依赖、Brandtstädter 和 Renner 应对问卷(有综合评分:追求目标的坚韧度(TGP)和灵活目标调整(FGA)应对方式)、EQ-5D-3L 和合并症。
多变量回归显示,更大的残疾程度(mRS)导致效用损失较大,mRS 为 1 至 5 的效用损失分别为 0.06 至 0.65(p<0.0001)。对照顾者的依赖导致另外的 0.104 不效用(p=0.0006),其变化与 mRS 有关(mRS 为 0 至 5 的患者的不效用分别为 0.044、0.060、0.083、0.115、0.150 和 0.173)。应对方式对效用的影响因应对方式、患者的残疾程度和对照顾者的依赖程度而异。FGA 应对方式与残疾和依赖的影响相比,与效用的额外增加有关(p<0.0001),而 TGA 则没有显著影响。FGA 应对方式与更残疾的患者的更大效用变化有关(mRS 为 0 至 mRS 5 的患者的额外效用分别为 0.018 至 0.105)。依赖患者从 FGA 应对中获益更多,而独立于照顾者的患者获益较少:中度至高度 FGA 应对的效用增益分别为 0.049 和 0.072。相比之下,独立患者的 FGA 应对方式同样积极的转变导致 0.039 和 0.057 的效用增益。最后,我们发现重要的卒中危险因素和合并症,如糖尿病和心房颤动,在多变量环境中不是 EQ-5D 效用的预测因素。
本研究表明,针对灵活应对方式和减少对照顾者的依赖的治疗策略可能会导致生活质量的显著提高,超过仅针对残疾的治疗策略。