FitzPatrick Beverly
School of Pharmacy (cross with Faculty of Education), Memorial University, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Feb;11(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Validity has had a contentious history in qualitative research. This is so for qualitative health education research as well. Establishing and writing about validity in qualitative research can be a challenging task as there are numerous viewpoints on what constitutes validity and varied nomenclature, such as trustworthiness, credibility, dependability, confirmability, authenticity, rigor, plausibility, goodness, soundness, transferability, and quality assessment. However, there is general agreement that establishing trust in the inferences that are made is necessary. Validity is dependent on the purpose and context of the research, and refers to conclusions that are based on particular methods used to address validity threats that are pertinent to the particular research. This article should help researchers distinguish among a variety of validation checks for a contextualized approach to establishing validity and apply these checks to their own qualitative health education research.
效度在定性研究中有着颇具争议的历史。定性健康教育研究亦是如此。在定性研究中确立并阐述效度可能是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为对于效度的构成要素存在众多观点以及各种不同的术语,如可信度、可靠性、可依赖性、可确证性、真实性、严谨性、合理性、恰当性、稳健性、可转移性和质量评估等。然而,人们普遍认为有必要对所做的推论建立信任。效度取决于研究的目的和背景,指的是基于用于应对与特定研究相关的效度威胁的特定方法得出的结论。本文应有助于研究人员区分用于确立效度的情境化方法的各种验证检查,并将这些检查应用于他们自己的定性健康教育研究中。