Krefting L
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Mar;45(3):214-22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214.
Despite a growing interest in qualitative research in occupational therapy, little attention has been placed on establishing its rigor. This article presents one model that can be used for the assessment of trustworthiness or merit of qualitative inquiry. Guba's (1981) model describes four general criteria for evaluation of research and then defines each from both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. Several strategies for the achievement of rigor in qualitative research useful for both researchers and consumers of research are described.
尽管职业治疗领域对定性研究的兴趣日益浓厚,但在确立其严谨性方面却很少受到关注。本文介绍了一种可用于评估定性研究可信度或价值的模型。古巴(1981年)的模型描述了评估研究的四个一般标准,然后从定量和定性两个角度对每个标准进行了定义。文中还描述了一些有助于研究人员和研究使用者在定性研究中实现严谨性的策略。