• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲近还是疏远?基于心理距离视角的员工-组织关系探究。

Closeness or Distance? An Investigation of Employee-Organization Relationships: From a Psychological Distance Perspective.

作者信息

Li Shanshan, Chen Hong

机构信息

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;9:2765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02765. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02765
PMID:30733699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6353851/
Abstract

It is of great significance to grasp and control the relationship between organizations and employees for the healthy development of an organization. This paper measured the closeness and distance of the employee-organization relationship. The results were based on an investigation of 554 employees. (1) The mean value of the employee-organization psychological distance (EOPD) was 3.51, indicating that the relationship between the employee and organization was not optimistic. (2) 48.79% of the 554 interviewees maintained "existence" relationships with their organizations, 28.13% of people maintained "exclude" relationships with their organizations, 20.44% had a "loyalty" relationship, while only 2.64% had an "integrated" relationship with their organization. (3) EOPD showed significant differences in terms of age, marital status, education, career, position and area of residence. (4) Detailed analysis was undertaken to explore the distribution characteristics of four relationships, and specific rules were found. Our research provided a new perspective and related references for the further study of organizational management.

摘要

把握和掌控组织与员工之间的关系对于组织的健康发展具有重大意义。本文对员工-组织关系的亲疏程度进行了测量。结果基于对554名员工的调查得出。(1)员工-组织心理距离(EOPD)的平均值为3.51,表明员工与组织之间的关系不容乐观。(2)在554名受访者中,48.79%与他们的组织保持“存续”关系,28.13%的人与他们的组织保持“疏离”关系,20.44%有“忠诚”关系,而只有2.64%与他们的组织有“融合”关系。(3)EOPD在年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、职业、职位和居住地区方面存在显著差异。(4)进行了详细分析以探究四种关系的分布特征,并发现了具体规律。我们的研究为组织管理的进一步研究提供了新的视角和相关参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/71356feb81ae/fpsyg-09-02765-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/b3fb8c371bd8/fpsyg-09-02765-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/9fe792ef43ea/fpsyg-09-02765-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/44ee924fbc18/fpsyg-09-02765-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/dfa10a14cb10/fpsyg-09-02765-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/11d8d97bc5d3/fpsyg-09-02765-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/cd1489b10e0f/fpsyg-09-02765-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/9b40cecfbee4/fpsyg-09-02765-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/73267a91a650/fpsyg-09-02765-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/b1e7691154e7/fpsyg-09-02765-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/71356feb81ae/fpsyg-09-02765-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/b3fb8c371bd8/fpsyg-09-02765-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/9fe792ef43ea/fpsyg-09-02765-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/44ee924fbc18/fpsyg-09-02765-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/dfa10a14cb10/fpsyg-09-02765-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/11d8d97bc5d3/fpsyg-09-02765-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/cd1489b10e0f/fpsyg-09-02765-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/9b40cecfbee4/fpsyg-09-02765-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/73267a91a650/fpsyg-09-02765-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/b1e7691154e7/fpsyg-09-02765-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e345/6353851/71356feb81ae/fpsyg-09-02765-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Closeness or Distance? An Investigation of Employee-Organization Relationships: From a Psychological Distance Perspective.亲近还是疏远?基于心理距离视角的员工-组织关系探究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;9:2765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02765. eCollection 2018.
2
Measuring the Psychological Distance between an Organization and Its Members-The Construction and Validation of a New Scale.测量组织与其成员之间的心理距离——一种新量表的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 9;8:2296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02296. eCollection 2017.
3
Promoting Employee Green Behavior Through the Person-Organization Fit: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Distance.通过个人与组织契合促进员工绿色行为:心理距离的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 9;11:568385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568385. eCollection 2020.
4
Management commitment to safety as organizational support: relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees.管理层对安全的承诺作为组织支持:与木材制造员工非安全结果的关系。
J Safety Res. 2005;36(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002.
5
Leaders, managers, and employee care.领导者、管理者与员工关怀。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2012 Jan-Mar;31(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318242d526.
6
An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes.员工-组织价值一致性与员工态度之间的关系分析。
J Psychol. 2008 Nov;142(6):615-31. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.6.615-632.
7
Employee-Organization Pro-environmental Values Fit and Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Supervisors' Personal Values.员工-组织亲环境价值观契合与亲环境行为:主管个人价值观的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):519-557. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Employee retention: an issue of survival in healthcare.员工留用:医疗保健领域的生存问题。
Radiol Manage. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):52-5.
9
More work, better health? The moderation effect of employee-organizational psychological distance.更多工作,更好健康?员工-组织心理距离的调节效应。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Oct;26(12):2200-2212. doi: 10.1177/1359105320906244. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Employee retention: a customer service approach.员工保留:一种客户服务方法。
Radiol Manage. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):16-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived superior trust and organizational commitment among public employees: The mediating role of burnout and the moderating role of public service motivation.公共部门雇员中感知到的更高信任与组织承诺:倦怠的中介作用与公共服务动机的调节作用
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24997. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24997. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Leader Member Exchange Scale (LMX-7): A Validation Study.领导成员交换量表(LMX - 7)意大利语版本的心理测量特性:一项效度研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;11(13):1957. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131957.
3
Can empowering leadership promote employees' pro-environmental behavior? Empirical analysis based on psychological distance.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Psychological Distance between an Organization and Its Members-The Construction and Validation of a New Scale.测量组织与其成员之间的心理距离——一种新量表的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 9;8:2296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02296. eCollection 2017.
2
The emergence of human prosociality: aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms.人类亲社会性的出现:通过情感、关注和规范与他人保持一致。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00822. eCollection 2014.
3
Empathy in hippocampal amnesia.海马体遗忘症中的同理心。
赋能型领导能否促进员工的环保行为?基于心理距离的实证分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:774561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774561. eCollection 2022.
4
Public psychological distance and spatial distribution characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Chinese context.新冠疫情期间的公众心理距离与空间分布特征:中国背景
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(2):1065-1084. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01861-x. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
5
Promoting Employee Green Behavior Through the Person-Organization Fit: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Distance.通过个人与组织契合促进员工绿色行为:心理距离的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 9;11:568385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568385. eCollection 2020.
6
Who Reports Low Interactive Psychology Status? An Investigation Based on Chinese Coal Miners.谁报告低互动心理学状态?基于中国煤矿工人的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):3446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103446.
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 22;4:69. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00069. eCollection 2013.
4
Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: a psychological distance account.理想主义的建议与务实的选择:心理距离的解释。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1105-17. doi: 10.1037/a0027013. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
5
Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior.解释水平与心理距离:对表征、预测、评估及行为的影响
J Consum Psychol. 2007;17(2):83-95. doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
6
Attachment, self-compassion, empathy, and subjective well-being among college students and community adults.大学生和社区成年人的依恋、自我同情、同理心和主观幸福感。
J Pers. 2011 Feb;79(1):191-221. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00677.x.
7
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.心理距离的构建层次理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.
8
Perspective taking modulates event-related potentials to perceived pain.观点采择调节与感知疼痛相关的事件相关电位。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jan 29;469(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.021. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
9
Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment.超越组织承诺的三成分模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):70-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.70.
10
Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.心理距离的自动加工:来自斯特鲁普任务的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):610-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610.