Department of Pharmacy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 10;2019:3192351. doi: 10.1155/2019/3192351. eCollection 2019.
Prophylactic therapy with silymarin to prevent the development of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (anti-TB DILI) has been under debate. We aimed to evaluate the effect of silymarin in the prevention of anti-TB DILI.
We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 30th November 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared silymarin and placebo to prevent anti-TB DILI were included. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effect of silymarin. The quality of included studies was assessed according to Cochrane handbook. Funnel plots and Egger's tests were carried out to evaluate publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the influence of each study.
A total of 1198 patients from five RCTs (585 with silymarin and 613 with placebo groups) were included. Overall, silymarin significantly reduced the occurrence of anti-TB DILI at week 4 [RR: 0.33, 95% CI (0.15, 0.75)]. In addition, silymarin exerted protective effect on liver function in patients undergoing anti-TB drugs [SMD = - 0.15, 95% CI (-0.24, -0.07), P < 0.001 (ALT); SMD =-0.14, 95% CI (-0.23, -0.06), P = 0.001(AST); SMD =-0.12, 95% CI (-0.20, -0.03), P = 0.008 (ALP)]. Silymarin led to similar AEs in placebo groups [OR: 1.09, 95% CI (0.86, 1.39), P = 0.47].
Prophylactic therapy of silymarin is contributed to a noticeably reduced risk of development of anti-TB DILI four weeks after the initiation. In addition, silymarin significantly improved the liver function in patients who are receiving anti-TB drugs.
水飞蓟宾预防性治疗以预防抗结核药物性肝损伤(anti-TB DILI)一直存在争议。本研究旨在评估水飞蓟宾预防抗结核药物性肝损伤的效果。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)截至 2018 年 11 月 30 日的数据。纳入比较水飞蓟宾和安慰剂预防抗结核药物性肝损伤的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 STATA 12.0 软件进行所有统计学分析。采用标准化均数差(SMD)和风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)评估水飞蓟宾的效果。根据 Cochrane 手册评估纳入研究的质量。采用漏斗图和 Egger 检验评估发表偏倚。进行敏感性分析以评估每项研究的影响。
共纳入来自 5 项 RCT 的 1198 例患者(水飞蓟宾组 585 例,安慰剂组 613 例)。总体而言,水飞蓟宾可显著降低第 4 周抗结核药物性肝损伤的发生[RR:0.33,95%CI(0.15,0.75)]。此外,水飞蓟宾可改善抗结核药物治疗患者的肝功能[SMD=-0.15,95%CI(-0.24,-0.07),P<0.001(ALT);SMD=-0.14,95%CI(-0.23,-0.06),P=0.001(AST);SMD=-0.12,95%CI(-0.20,-0.03),P=0.008(ALP)]。水飞蓟宾在安慰剂组的不良反应发生率相似[OR:1.09,95%CI(0.86,1.39),P=0.47]。
水飞蓟宾预防性治疗可显著降低抗结核药物性肝损伤发生的风险,在开始治疗 4 周后尤为明显。此外,水飞蓟宾可显著改善接受抗结核药物治疗患者的肝功能。