• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

想象中的群体间接触能否改变关于内群体与外群体差异的(内心)对话?

Can imagined intergroup contact change (internal) dialogues on differences between ingroup and outgroup?

作者信息

Puchalska-Wasyl Małgorzata M

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2019 Apr;60(2):181-188. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12524. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1111/sjop.12524
PMID:30734305
Abstract

Several positive functions have been ascribed to integrative internal dialogues (IDs), which are based on mutual openness to a partner's viewpoint and a readiness to consider his/her arguments in order to potentially modify one's own stance. As the technique of imagined intergroup contact (IIC) favorably influences attitudes towards outgroup members, it was hypothesized that IIC would have a beneficial impact on IDs with an outgroup member when the dialogue is focused on differences between ingroup and outgroup. In the experiment, 151 people (80 women) participated. It revealed that after IIC, both the dialogue author's confrontational attitude and the interlocutor's integrative attitude decreased. Thus, IIC made participants less inclined to gain an advantage over their imagined outgroup interlocutors and more inclined to give them freedom in IDs. However, the effect was significant only when the author's involvement in ID was high or medium.

摘要

整合性内部对话(IDs)具有多种积极作用,它基于对伙伴观点的相互开放以及愿意考虑对方论点以潜在地改变自己立场。由于想象的群体间接触(IIC)技术对对外群体成员的态度有积极影响,因此假设当对话聚焦于内群体和外群体之间的差异时,IIC会对与外群体成员的IDs产生有益影响。在该实验中,151人(80名女性)参与。结果显示,在IIC之后,对话发起者的对抗态度和对话者的整合态度都有所降低。因此,IIC使参与者减少了在与想象中的外群体对话者交流中获取优势的倾向,而更倾向于在IDs中给予对方自由。然而,只有当发起者对ID的参与度为高或中等时,这种效果才显著。

相似文献

1
Can imagined intergroup contact change (internal) dialogues on differences between ingroup and outgroup?想象中的群体间接触能否改变关于内群体与外群体差异的(内心)对话?
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Apr;60(2):181-188. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12524. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Similarity to imagined interlocutor and integration of viewpoints in internal dialogues.想象对话者的相似性和内部对话中观点的整合。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):659-667. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12514. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Relationship of personality with integration and confrontation in internal dialogues.个性与内心对话中的整合及对抗的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Oct;58(5):451-457. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12387. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Embodying imagined contact: facial feedback moderates the intergroup consequences of mental simulation.体现想象中的接触:面部反馈调节心理模拟的群体间后果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):387-95. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12057. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
5
I (dis)like the way you (dis)like them: The role of extended contact on social distance and attitudes towards the ingroup.我(不)喜欢你(不)喜欢他们的方式:扩展接触对社会距离和内群体态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):95-120. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12381. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
Imagine how to behave: the influence of imagined contact on human-robot interaction.试想一下行为方式:想象接触对人机交互的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180038. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0038.
7
Why We Learn Less from Observing Outgroups.为何我们从观察外群体中学到的较少。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 6;41(1):144-152. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0926-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.想象中的互动能产生积极的认知吗?通过模拟社交接触减少偏见。
Am Psychol. 2009 May-Jun;64(4):231-40. doi: 10.1037/a0014718.
9
Disentangling contact and socialization effects on outgroup attitudes in diverse friendship networks.在多元友谊网络中,厘清接触和社会化效应对群体态度的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;122(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000240. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?延伸接触效应:接触积极的外群体榜样是否足够,还是与内群体成员互动是必要的?
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov-Dec;151(6):737-53. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.522622.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of strategies from the social sciences to inform pipeline development programs for under-represented minority faculty and students in the health sciences.运用社会科学的策略为健康科学领域中代表性不足的少数族裔教员和学生的人才培养项目提供信息。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 14;5(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.566.