Puchalska-Wasyl Małgorzata M
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland.
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Oct;58(5):451-457. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12387. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Interest in confrontational and integrative internal dialogues (IDs) has been growing, as they perform numerous important functions. This study aimed to identify the personality-related determinants of integration and confrontation processes in ID that simulates social relationships. The test group comprised 125 students (62 men). Participants were given a description of a fictional problem facing a young married couple and they were to imagine a dialogue between the characters. Additionally three instruments were administered: the NEO Five Factor Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised Questionnaire and the Integration-Confrontation Questionnaire. Using canonical correlation analysis it was found that intense neuroticism and anxious or avoidant attachments, combined with low openness, conscientiousness and agreeableness, are conducive to confrontational attitude in the author of a dialogue, whereas the opposite combination of personality characteristics is associated with integrative attitudes in both parties to the dialogue.
对对抗性和整合性内部对话(IDs)的兴趣一直在增长,因为它们发挥着许多重要功能。本研究旨在确定在模拟社会关系的内部对话中,与整合和对抗过程相关的人格决定因素。测试组由125名学生(62名男性)组成。参与者收到了一对年轻已婚夫妇面临的虚构问题的描述,并被要求想象角色之间的对话。此外,还使用了三种工具:大五人格量表、亲密关系经历修订问卷和整合-对抗问卷。通过典型相关分析发现,强烈的神经质以及焦虑或回避型依恋,再加上低开放性、尽责性和宜人性,有利于对话作者采取对抗态度,而相反的人格特征组合则与对话双方的整合态度相关。