• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个数据登记处,以评估护理实践的质量和安全性。

Development of a data registry to evaluate the quality and safety of nursing practice.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

School of Nursing & Midwifery, College of Science, Health & Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1877-1888. doi: 10.1111/jan.13967. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/jan.13967
PMID:30734353
Abstract

AIM

To describe the development, testing, and implementation of a data registry of nursing-sensitive indicators for measuring the quality and safety of nursing practice.

BACKGROUND

Recent research has established causal links between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Unit level data is necessary for implementation of evidence-based strategies on nurse staffing and nursing care processes.

DESIGN

Multi-site, cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from administrative data sets on nurse staffing, patient flow, and adverse events in three hospitals in 2016. Periodic observational surveys on pressure injury prevalence, hand hygiene practices, and documentation of processes of care were also conducted. Prospective data were collected from patients at time of discharge using the Caring Assessment Tool. Nurses' perceptions of their practice environment were assessed using the Nursing Work Index - Revised: Australian. Data from annual Press Ganey surveys on patient satisfaction/experience were obtained.

RESULTS

The Australian Nursing Outcomes Collaborative (AUSNOC) data registry was developed in three phases. Phase 1 involved development of a data codebook; phase 2 involved development and testing of data collection methods; and phase 3 involved development of data reports and data dissemination strategies. This paper gives an overview of these phases and includes a summary of the descriptive statistics from the indicator set.

CONCLUSION

Unit level data is pivotal for measuring the quality and safety of nursing care. Data from the Australian Nursing Outcomes Collaborative (AUSNOC) can be feasibly collected and used to benchmark nursing performance, evaluate patient outcomes, and identify areas for practice improvement.

摘要

目的

描述护理敏感指标数据登记册的开发、测试和实施,以衡量护理实践的质量和安全性。

背景

最近的研究已经确定了护士人数与患者结果之间的因果关系。单元级别的数据对于实施基于证据的护士人数和护理护理流程策略是必要的。

设计

多地点、横断面设计。

方法

2016 年,从三家医院的行政数据集收集了关于护士人员配备、患者流动和不良事件的回顾性数据。还定期进行了压疮发生率、手卫生实践和护理过程记录的观察性调查。使用关怀评估工具在患者出院时收集前瞻性数据。护士对其实践环境的看法使用修订后的护理工作指数-澳大利亚进行评估。从年度患者满意度/体验民意调查的 Press Ganey 调查中获得数据。

结果

澳大利亚护理成果协作组织(AUSNOC)数据登记册分三个阶段开发。第 1 阶段涉及数据代码本的开发;第 2 阶段涉及数据收集方法的开发和测试;第 3 阶段涉及数据报告和数据传播策略的制定。本文概述了这些阶段,并包括了指标集的描述性统计数据的摘要。

结论

单元级别的数据对于衡量护理护理的质量和安全性至关重要。来自澳大利亚护理成果协作组织(AUSNOC)的数据可以进行可行的收集,并用于基准护理绩效、评估患者结果和确定实践改进领域。

相似文献

1
Development of a data registry to evaluate the quality and safety of nursing practice.开发一个数据登记处,以评估护理实践的质量和安全性。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1877-1888. doi: 10.1111/jan.13967. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
A causal model for the quality of nursing care in Thailand.泰国护理质量的因果模型。
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Mar;66(1):130-138. doi: 10.1111/inr.12474. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
A longitudinal examination of the association between nurse staffing levels, the practice environment and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals.对医院护士人员配备水平、执业环境与护士敏感型患者结局之间关联的纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 4;15:538. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1198-0.
4
Correlates and predictors of missed nursing care in hospitals.医院中护理缺失的相关因素及预测指标
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1524-1534. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13449. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
Factors influencing nurse-assessed quality nursing care: A cross-sectional study in hospitals.影响护士评估的优质护理服务的因素:医院的横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):935-945. doi: 10.1111/jan.13507. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
The effect of nursing care delivery models on quality and safety outcomes of care: A cross-sectional survey study of medical-surgical nurses.护理服务模式对护理质量和安全结果的影响:一项外科护士的横断面调查研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Oct;75(10):2144-2155. doi: 10.1111/jan.13997. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Efficacy of Using Available Data to Examine Nurse Staffing Ratios and Quality of Care Metrics.利用现有数据审查护士人员配备比例和护理质量指标的有效性。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2020 Apr;52(2):78-83. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000499.
8
The introduction of DRG funding and hospital nurses' changing perceptions of their practice environment, quality of care and satisfaction: comparison of cross-sectional surveys over a 10-year period.DRG 资金的引入和医院护士对实践环境、护理质量和满意度的看法的变化:10 年期间横断面调查的比较。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
9
Nursing unit teams matter: Impact of unit-level nurse practice environment, nurse work characteristics, and burnout on nurse reported job outcomes, and quality of care, and patient adverse events--a cross-sectional survey.护理单元团队很重要:单元层面护士执业环境、护士工作特征及职业倦怠对护士报告的工作成果、护理质量和患者不良事件的影响——一项横断面调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1123-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.009. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
10
Comparison of reports of missed nursing care: Registered Nurses vs. practical nurses in hospitals.漏失护理报告的比较:医院注册护士与执业护士的对比
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1227-1236. doi: 10.1111/scs.12570. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Received Knowledge of Care as Evaluated by Patients and Their Significant Others: A Feedback-Register Study.患者及其重要他人对所获护理知识的评价:一项反馈登记研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70065. doi: 10.1111/scs.70065.
2
Work Engagement and Safety Behavior of Nurses in Specialized Cancer Hospitals: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy.专科医院护士的工作投入与安全行为:自我效能感的中介作用
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Jun 15;2023:9034073. doi: 10.1155/2023/9034073. eCollection 2023.
3
Nurses' Clinical Decision-Making About Pressure Injury Prevention in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.
护士在医院环境中关于预防压疮的临床决策:一项范围综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5763-5792. doi: 10.1111/jan.16776. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
Quality care for children and young people with complex and integrated care needs: A discussion on nursing-sensitive indicators.为有复杂和综合护理需求的儿童及青少年提供优质护理:关于护理敏感指标的讨论
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 29;8:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100275. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The pressure injury prevalence and practice improvements (PIPPI) study: A multiple methods evaluation of pressure injury prevention practices in an acute-care hospital.压力性损伤发生率和实践改进(PIPPI)研究:对一家急症医院压力性损伤预防实践的多种方法评估。
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70050. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70050.
6
Identifying Nursing-Sensitive Indicators for Hospitals: A Modified Delphi Approach.确定医院护理敏感指标:一种改进的德尔菲法。
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59472. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing and their impact on pressure injuries: A cross-sectional multi-source study.安全文化、护理质量、漏护、护士人员配备及其对压疮的影响:一项横断面多源研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 29;5:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100125. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Pressure injury prevalence in critical care settings: An observational pre-post intervention study.重症监护环境中的压力性损伤发生率:一项观察性前后干预研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Feb;11(2):e2110. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2110.
9
Impact of Target Management Card on Patient Safety in the Emergency Department: A Mixed Methods Study.目标管理卡对急诊科患者安全的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Sep 18;16:1905-1914. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S427988. eCollection 2023.
10
Perceived Relationship Between Horizontal Violence and Patient Safety Culture Among Nurses.护士对横向暴力与患者安全文化之间关系的认知
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Aug 14;16:1545-1553. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S419309. eCollection 2023.