• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全文化、护理质量、漏护、护士人员配备及其对压疮的影响:一项横断面多源研究。

Safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing and their impact on pressure injuries: A cross-sectional multi-source study.

作者信息

Alanazi Faisal Khalaf, Lapkin Samuel, Molloy Luke, Sim Jenny

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2500 Australia.

Discipline of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD 4225, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 29;5:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100125. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100125
PMID:38746552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11080418/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety culture is known to influence patient outcomes, but the relationship between nursing units' safety cultures and the development of pressure injuries in acute care hospitals is unclear. Pressure injuries are a nursing-sensitive patient outcome and are widely considered preventable.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of unit safety culture, nursing unit characteristics, and missed care on pressure injury rates in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

DESIGN

A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted between August and November 2021 and compared to secondary data on the incidence of pressure injuries.

SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 653 nurses from 35 units in five Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia participated in this study.

METHODS

The survey included validated scales of safety culture, nurse staffing, and nurses' perceptions of quality of care, missed care, and the frequency of pressure injury. Secondary data on pressure injuries were collected from the Ministry of Health administrative database between 2018 and 2021. Descriptive analysis and Generalized Linear Models were performed.

RESULTS

Higher safety culture scores were associated with fewer pressure injuries (β = -2.000, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -3.107, -0.893) and lower nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries in their unit (β = -1.224, 95% CI -2.255, -0.192). High scores on the sub-scales of hospital management (β = -2.105, 95% CI -2.835, -1.375) and safety climate (β = -1.402, 95% CI -2.383, -0.421) were the most statistically significant predictor for pressure injury prevention. Higher frequency of missed nursing care was positively associated with higher rates of pressure injuries (β = 1.606, 95% CI 0.187, 3.024) and higher nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries (β = 1.243, 95% CI 0.211, 2.363). There was a positive relationship between higher nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury and higher incidence rate of pressure injury as reported in the incident management system (β = 1.183, 95% CI 0.065, 2.301).

CONCLUSION

Nursing units with stronger safety climate and safety behavior scores, higher ratings of hospital and unit quality of care, and lower levels of missed nursing care were associated with lower incidence of pressure injury and nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury in their units. Nurses' perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries are concordant with the incidence of pressure injuries and can be a valid measure to capture patient outcomes within a specific time.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

High safety culture and lower missed care are linked to fewer pressure injuries in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Nurses' perceptions of pressure injury frequency aligned with reported incidence rates, indicating a valid measure of patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

安全文化已知会影响患者预后,但急性护理医院中护理单元的安全文化与压力性损伤的发生之间的关系尚不清楚。压力性损伤是一种护理敏感型患者预后,并且被广泛认为是可预防的。

目的

研究沙特阿拉伯医院中单元安全文化、护理单元特征及护理缺失对压力性损伤发生率的影响。

设计

2021年8月至11月进行了一项多中心横断面研究,并与压力性损伤发生率的二级数据进行比较。

设置/参与者:沙特阿拉伯五家卫生部医院35个单元的653名护士参与了本研究。

方法

该调查包括经过验证的安全文化量表、护士配备情况,以及护士对护理质量、护理缺失和压力性损伤发生频率的看法。2018年至2021年期间从卫生部行政数据库收集压力性损伤的二级数据。进行了描述性分析和广义线性模型分析。

结果

较高的安全文化得分与较少的压力性损伤相关(β = -2.000,95%置信区间[CI] -3.107,-0.893),且护士对其所在单元压力性损伤发生频率的认知较低(β = -1.224,95% CI -2.255,-0.192)。医院管理(β = -2.105,95% CI -2.835,-1.375)和安全氛围(β = -1.402,95% CI -2.383,-0.421)子量表的高分是预防压力性损伤最具统计学意义的预测因素。较高的护理缺失频率与较高的压力性损伤发生率呈正相关(β = 1.606,95% CI 0.187,3.024),且护士对压力性损伤发生频率的认知较高(β = 1.243,95% CI 0.211,2.363)。护士对压力性损伤发生频率的较高认知与事件管理系统中报告的较高压力性损伤发生率之间存在正相关关系(β = 1.183,95% CI 0.065,2.301)。

结论

具有更强安全氛围和安全行为得分、更高医院及单元护理质量评级以及更低护理缺失水平的护理单元,其压力性损伤发生率及护士对所在单元压力性损伤发生频率的认知较低。护士对压力性损伤发生频率的认知与压力性损伤发生率一致,并且可以作为在特定时间内衡量患者预后的有效指标。

可发推文摘要

在沙特阿拉伯医院中,高安全文化和较低的护理缺失与较少的压力性损伤相关。护士对压力性损伤发生频率的认知与报告的发生率一致,表明是衡量患者预后的有效指标。

相似文献

1
Safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing and their impact on pressure injuries: A cross-sectional multi-source study.安全文化、护理质量、漏护、护士人员配备及其对压疮的影响:一项横断面多源研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 29;5:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100125. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The impact of safety culture, quality of care, missed care and nurse staffing on patient falls: A multisource association study.安全文化、护理质量、护理缺失和护士人力配置对患者跌倒的影响:多源关联研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7260-7272. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16792. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care units: A multisource study examining nurses' safety attitudes, quality of care, missed care, and nurse staffing.成人重症监护病房中的医疗保健相关性感染:一项多源研究,调查护士的安全态度、护理质量、护理疏忽和护士人力配置。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Oct;78:103480. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103480. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture and adverse events in Hail City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional approach to improving healthcare safety.沙特阿拉伯海尔市护士对患者安全文化和不良事件的认知:改善医疗保健安全的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e084741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084741.
5
Nurses' personal and ward accountability and missed nursing care: A cross-sectional study.护士的个人责任和病房责任与护理缺失:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
6
Compassion fatigue in critical care nurses and its impact on nurse-sensitive indicators in Saudi Arabian hospitals.重症监护病房护士的同情疲劳及其对沙特阿拉伯医院护士敏感指标的影响。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Nov;33(6):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
7
Emergency room nurses' caring ability and its relationship with patient safety outcomes: A cross-sectional study.急诊室护士的关怀能力及其与患者安全结果的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Feb;72:101389. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101389. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
Association between nurses' experiences of workplace incivility and the culture of safety of hospitals: A cross-sectional Study.护士工作场所不文明行为经历与医院安全文化之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):320-331. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16230. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
Factors Associated with Intensive Care Units' Nurses Frequency of Performing Pressure Injury Prevention: A Cross-sectional Study.与重症监护病房护士进行压力性损伤预防频率相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Dec;68:151640. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151640. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
10
Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯三家医院护士对患者安全文化的认知。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Jul;50(4):422-431. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12394. Epub 2018 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Workplace Incivility and Its Relationship With Patient Safety Culture Among EMS Staff: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study in Iran.评估急救医疗服务人员工作场所的不文明行为及其与患者安全文化的关系:伊朗的一项横断面分析研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Mar 25;2025:8846297. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8846297. eCollection 2025.
2
Missing Fundamental Nursing Care: What's the Extent of Missed Oral Care? A Cross-Sectional Study.缺失基本护理:口腔护理缺失的程度如何?一项横断面研究。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 23;14(4):4193-4206. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040305.
3
Commentary: Nurses' attitudes towards patient safety and their relationship to adverse patient events in Oman.评论:阿曼护士对患者安全的态度及其与患者不良事件的关系。
J Res Nurs. 2024 Oct 13:17449871241273896. doi: 10.1177/17449871241273896.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing missing and erroneous data in nurse staffing surveys.护士人员配备调查中缺失和错误数据的管理。
Nurse Res. 2023 Jun 7;31(2):19-27. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1878. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
2
Nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.护士人员配备水平与患者结局:纵向研究的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Oct;134:104311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104311. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
Pressure injuries in Australian public hospitals: A cost of illness study.澳大利亚公立医院的压疮:一项疾病成本研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jun;130:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104191. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Nurse staffing, missed care, quality of care and adverse events: A cross-sectional study.护士人力配置、遗漏护理、护理质量和不良事件:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Mar;30(2):447-454. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13501. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Systematic review: Nurses' safety attitudes and their impact on patient outcomes in acute-care hospitals.系统评价:急性护理医院护士的安全态度及其对患者结局的影响。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):30-43. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1063. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
6
Dimensions of safety culture: a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods for assessing safety culture in hospitals.安全文化的维度:系统综述评估医院安全文化的定量、定性和混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 27;11(7):e043982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043982.
7
The role of nurse staffing in the performance of function-preserving processes during acute hospitalization: A cross-sectional study.护士人力配置在急性住院期间保留功能过程中的作用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103999. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103999. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
The association between nurse staffing and inpatient mortality: A shift-level retrospective longitudinal study.护士人员配备与住院患者死亡率之间的关联:一项班次水平的回顾性纵向研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Aug;120:103950. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103950. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
9
The impact of nurse staffing methodologies on nurse and patient outcomes: A systematic review.护士人力配置方法对护士和患者结局的影响:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4599-4611. doi: 10.1111/jan.14909. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
The Psychological Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Nurses in Saudi Arabia and Their Coping Strategies.2019年冠状病毒病对沙特阿拉伯护士的心理影响及其应对策略
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Apr 20;7:23779608211011322. doi: 10.1177/23779608211011322. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.