• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估防腐剂在生物膜相关金黄色葡萄球菌人工血管移植物感染中疗效的新型体外模型。

New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection.

机构信息

1 Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, M. K. Ciurlionio str. 21, Vilnius, Lithuania.

2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2019 Mar;68(3):432-439. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000939. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.000939
PMID:30735113
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a new in vitro model of prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) and evaluate antimicrobial and biofilm-disrupting efficacy of 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride, 10% povidone-iodine and 0.02% chlorhexidine digluconate against biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).

METHODOLOGY

The effect of antiseptics on the microscopic integrity and antimicrobial effect on S. aureus biofilms was tested by growing biofilms on glass coverslips, in the modified Lubbock chronic wound pathogenic biofilm (LCWPB) model and on the surface of vascular grafts using qualitive and quantitative methods as well as by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Chlorhexidine worked best on destroying the integrity of S. aureus biofilms (P=0.002). In the LCWPB model, octenidine and povidone-iodine eradicated all S. aureus colonies (from 1.79 × 10  c.f.u. ml to 0). In the newly developed PVGI model, the grafts were successfully colonized with biofilms as seen in SEM images. All antiseptics demonstrated significant antimicrobial efficacy, decreasing colony counts by seven orders of magnitude (P=0.002). Octenidine was superior to povidone-iodine (P=0.009) and chlorhexidine (P=0.041).

CONCLUSION

We implemented an innovative in vitro model on S. aureus biofilms grown in different settings, including a clinically challenging situation of PVGI. The strongest antimicrobial activity against S. aureus biofilms, grown on prosthetic vascular grafts, was showed by 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride. We suggest that combinational therapy of antiseptics between chlorhexidine with either povidone-iodine or octenidine dihydrochloride should be tested in further experiments. Despite the need of further studies, our findings of these in vitro experiments will assist the management of vascular graft infection in clinical cases.

摘要

目的

开发一种新的人工血管移植物感染(PVGI)体外模型,并评估 0.1%盐酸奥替尼啶、10%聚维酮碘和 0.02%葡萄糖酸氯己定对产生物膜金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)的抗菌和生物膜破坏效果。

方法

通过在改良的 Lubbock 慢性伤口致病生物膜(LCWPB)模型中以及在血管移植物表面使用定性和定量方法以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)生长生物膜,测试防腐剂对生物膜微观完整性的影响以及对 S. aureus 生物膜的抗菌效果。

结果

氯己定在破坏 S. aureus 生物膜的完整性方面效果最好(P=0.002)。在 LCWPB 模型中,奥替尼啶和聚维酮碘根除了所有 S. aureus 菌落(从 1.79×10 c.f.u. ml 降至 0)。在新开发的 PVGI 模型中,SEM 图像显示移植物成功定植了生物膜。所有防腐剂均表现出显著的抗菌功效,使菌落计数减少了 7 个数量级(P=0.002)。奥替尼啶优于聚维酮碘(P=0.009)和氯己定(P=0.041)。

结论

我们在不同环境中(包括 PVGI 这一具有挑战性的临床情况)对 S. aureus 生物膜实施了一种创新的体外模型。对人工血管移植物上生长的 S. aureus 生物膜显示出最强抗菌活性的是 0.1%盐酸奥替尼啶。我们建议在进一步的实验中测试氯己定与聚维酮碘或盐酸奥替尼啶之间的防腐剂联合治疗。尽管需要进一步研究,但我们的这些体外实验结果将有助于指导临床病例中血管移植物感染的治疗。

相似文献

1
New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection.评估防腐剂在生物膜相关金黄色葡萄球菌人工血管移植物感染中疗效的新型体外模型。
J Med Microbiol. 2019 Mar;68(3):432-439. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000939. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Efficacy of Antiseptic Solutions in Treatment of Infected Surgical Wounds with Patches of Vascular Graft: An Experimental Study in Rats.抗菌溶液治疗血管移植物补丁感染性外科伤口的疗效:大鼠实验研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Apr 15;55(4):106. doi: 10.3390/medicina55040106.
3
Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test.采用新型生物膜导向性防腐剂测试法测定含聚维酮碘、二盐酸奥替尼啶和乳酸依沙吖啶的防腐剂对铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌形成的生物膜的疗效。
Int Wound J. 2014 Dec;11(6):730-4. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12057. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
4
Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride.根据EN 14561对伤口消毒剂聚维酮碘、葡萄糖酸氯己定、聚己亚甲基双胍和盐酸奥替尼啶进行标准化测试的拟议2期/步骤2体外试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2220-4.
5
Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.常见消毒剂对生物膜中临床相关微生物的功效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2.
6
The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?感染的聚丙烯网:生物膜何时形成,哪种消毒剂最有效地清除它?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S294-S299. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.081. Epub 2024 May 8.
7
Wound care antiseptics - performance differences against Staphylococcus aureus in biofilm.伤口护理防腐剂——在生物膜中对金黄色葡萄球菌的性能差异
Acta Vet Scand. 2015 May 4;57(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0111-5.
8
Chlorhexidine Antiseptic Irrigation Eradicates Staphylococcus epidermidis From Biofilm: An In Vitro Study.洗必泰抗菌冲洗液可清除生物膜中的表皮葡萄球菌:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):648-653. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000052.
9
Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.纳米颗粒超声处理在消除钛表面金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜方面优于传统冲洗液:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2729-2734. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03982-y. Epub 2024 May 18.
10
The effects of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine and vancomycin on growth and biofilms of pathogens that cause prosthetic joint infections: an in-vitro model.洗必泰、聚维酮碘和万古霉素对人工关节感染病原体生长和生物膜形成的影响:体外模型。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep;151:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review of Experimental Assessment to Study Vascular Biomaterials Infections and Infectability.关于研究血管生物材料感染及易感性的实验评估的叙述性综述
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023 May 12;59:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023.
2
Biofilms in Chronic Wound Infections: Innovative Antimicrobial Approaches Using the In Vitro Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.慢性伤口感染中的生物膜:使用体外拉伯克慢性伤口生物膜模型的创新抗菌方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 5;24(2):1004. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021004.
3
Does washing medical devices before and after use decrease bacterial contamination?: An in vitro study.
使用前后清洗医疗器械是否能减少细菌污染?一项体外研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 2;100(13):e25285. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025285.
4
Randomised Controlled Trials of Alcohol-Based Surgical Site Skin Preparation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于预防手术部位感染的酒精基手术部位皮肤准备的随机对照试验:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 9;10(4):663. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040663.