LaGRANGE W S, Moon N J, Reed W
Department of Food Technology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
J Food Prot. 1977 Nov;40(11):744-746. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-40.11.744.
Twenty-seven raw milk samples were analyzed for their bacterial quality by the Standard Plate Count (SPC) and the plate loop count (PLC). All resultant plates were counted by three different technicians either manually or with a 3M Brand Automatic Colony Counter, Model 630. Results emphasize the superiority of the SPC over the PLC for samples with high bacterial numbers. The automatic colony counter tended to underestimate the number of colonies on a plate. Correction factors for conversion of PLC counts to SPC and automatic to manual counts were calculated. It is recommended that the PLC and the automatic colony counter be used with appropriate correction factors for routine analysis of large numbers of samples.
通过标准平板计数法(SPC)和平板圈数计数法(PLC)对27份生乳样品的细菌质量进行了分析。所有生成的平板均由三名不同的技术人员手动或使用3M品牌630型自动菌落计数器进行计数。结果强调了对于细菌数量较高的样品,SPC比PLC更具优势。自动菌落计数器往往会低估平板上的菌落数量。计算了将PLC计数转换为SPC计数以及将自动计数转换为手动计数的校正因子。建议在对大量样品进行常规分析时,使用适当校正因子的PLC和自动菌落计数器。