Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Doctoral School for Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Acta Cardiol. 2020 Jun;75(3):211-217. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1569313. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
The choice of glucose lowering agent in heart failure (HF)-patients can have a strong effect on HF-related adverse events, with some classes increasing and other classes reducing the risk. Little data is available about the choice of glucose lowering agents in HF-patients with type-2-diabetes. We performed a cross-sectional single centre point analysis of all patients with both a diagnoses of HF and type-2-diabetes followed in a tertiary HF-clinic. Medical records were used to determine the choice of current glucose lowering agent. Data at the time of cross-sectional analysis was used to determine potential eligibility to a sodium-glucose-linked-transporter-2-inhibitor (SGLT2-inhibitor) based on the enrolment criteria of the EMPAREG-OUTCOME-trial. A total of 571 HF-patients with diabetes were assessed on June the first 2017. The majority of patients were either managed with one or two glucose lowering agents (43% respectively 34%), with metformin ( = 391;61%), Insulin ( = 278;49%) and sulfonylurea ( = 259;45%) being the most frequently employed treatments. SGLT2-inhibitor use was low ( = 7;1%). According to trial criteria 184 patients (32%) qualified for an SGLT2-inhibitor. With main reasons for ineligibility being a HbA1C < 7% ( = 324) or a glomerular-filtration-rate <30 ml/min ( = 154; of whom 101 patients overlapped with HbA1C < 7%). However 54% of patients with a HbA1C < 7% were treated with ≥2 glucose lowering agents from a class other than SGLT-2-inhibiton. Despite potential eligibility, SGLT2-inhibition remains an underused glucose lowering agent in this contemporary HF-population. Additional research is necessary on optimising its implementation in clinical practice, which might include switching glucose lowering therapies in patients at HbA1C-target.
在心力衰竭 (HF) 患者中,选择降血糖药物会对与 HF 相关的不良事件产生重大影响,某些类别会增加风险,而其他类别则会降低风险。关于伴有 2 型糖尿病的 HF 患者选择降血糖药物的数据很少。我们对在三级 HF 诊所就诊的所有同时患有 HF 和 2 型糖尿病的患者进行了一项横断面单中心分析。使用病历确定当前降血糖药物的选择。使用横断面分析时的数据来确定根据 EMPAREG-OUTCOME 试验的入组标准是否有资格使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂 (SGLT2 抑制剂)。2017 年 6 月 1 日评估了 571 名 HF 合并糖尿病患者。大多数患者要么接受一种或两种降血糖药物治疗(分别为 43%和 34%),最常使用的治疗方法是二甲双胍( = 391;61%)、胰岛素( = 278;49%)和磺脲类( = 259;45%)。SGLT2 抑制剂的使用较低( = 7;1%)。根据试验标准,184 名患者(32%)有资格使用 SGLT2 抑制剂。不合格的主要原因是 HbA1C<7%( = 324)或肾小球滤过率 <30ml/min( = 154;其中 101 名患者与 HbA1C<7%重叠)。然而,54%的 HbA1C<7%患者使用的是除 SGLT-2 抑制剂以外的其他类别降血糖药物。尽管有潜在的资格,但在当代 HF 人群中,SGLT2 抑制剂仍然是一种使用不足的降血糖药物。需要进一步研究优化其在临床实践中的应用,这可能包括在 HbA1C 目标的患者中转换降血糖治疗。