Suppr超能文献

基于复合物的化学位移磁共振成像测量肝脏脂肪分数:简化采样方案对准确性的影响。

Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy.

作者信息

Procter Alexander J, Sun Julia Y, Malcolm Paul N, Toms Andoni P

机构信息

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0311-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The assessment of liver percentage fat fraction (%FF) using proton density fat fraction sequences is becoming increasingly accessible. Previous studies have tended to use multiple small ROIs that focus on Couinaud segments. In an effort to simplify day-to-day analysis, this study assesses the impact of using larger, elliptical ROIs focused on a single hepatic lobe. Additionally, we assess the impact of sampling fewer transhepatic slices when measuring %FF.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained images from 34 volunteers using an IDEAL IQ sequence. Two observers independently measured %FF using three different protocols: freehand whole-liver ROI (fh-ROI), elliptical-ROI on the right lobe (rt-ROI) and elliptical-ROI on the left lobe (lt-ROI).

RESULTS

Inter-observer reliability for all measurements techniques was 'excellent' (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients 0.81-0.98). There was a significant difference (Paired Wilcoxon Test: p < 0.001) between the median %FF obtained using fh-ROI when compared to the rt-ROI method, the maximum mean difference between the two techniques was 2.79% (95% CI). For all sampling methods a Kruskall-Wallis analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean %FF when the number of slices sampled was reduced from 11 to 1. The mean coefficient of variance increased when more slices were sampled (3 slices = 0.1, 11 slices = 0.17, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Simplified ROIs focused on one hepatic lobe provide %FF measurements that are unlikely to be sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice. Freehand whole-liver ROIs should be used in preference. A single freehand ROI measurement taken at the level of the hepatic hilum yields a %FF that is representative of the mean whole liver % FF. Multiple slices are needed to measure heterogeneity.

摘要

背景

使用质子密度脂肪分数序列评估肝脏脂肪百分比分数(%FF)越来越容易实现。以往的研究倾向于使用多个聚焦于Couinaud肝段的小感兴趣区(ROI)。为了简化日常分析,本研究评估使用更大的、聚焦于单个肝叶的椭圆形ROI的影响。此外,我们评估测量%FF时减少经肝切片采样数量的影响。

方法

对34名志愿者使用IDEAL IQ序列前瞻性获取的图像进行回顾性分析。两名观察者使用三种不同方案独立测量%FF:徒手全肝ROI(fh-ROI)、右叶椭圆形ROI(rt-ROI)和左叶椭圆形ROI(lt-ROI)。

结果

所有测量技术的观察者间可靠性“极佳”(Spearman等级相关系数0.81 - 0.98)。与rt-ROI方法相比,使用fh-ROI获得的%FF中位数存在显著差异(配对Wilcoxon检验:p < 0.001),两种技术之间的最大平均差异为2.79%(95%置信区间)。对于所有采样方法,当采样切片数量从11片减少到1片时,Kruskal-Wallis分析表明平均%FF无显著差异。采样切片数量增加时,平均变异系数增加(3片 = 0.1,11片 = 0.17,p < 0.001)。

结论

聚焦于一个肝叶的简化ROI提供的%FF测量值在临床实践中可能不够准确。应优先使用徒手全肝ROI。在肝门水平进行单次徒手ROI测量可获得代表全肝平均%FF的数值。需要多个切片来测量异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b45/6368805/eb0b04ee2141/12880_2019_311_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验