TUM Medical Education Center, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9.
Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating specific, structured and behavioral feedback.
We condensed best practice recommendations for feedback in a CST for undergraduate medical students and compared the effect of specific, structured and behavior-orientated feedback (intervention group CST-behav) to general, experience-orientated feedback (CST- exp. as our control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated changes on communication skills evaluated by independent raters, and evaluated by standardized patients (SP). To do that, every student was video-recorded in a pre and post assessment.
Sixty-six undergraduate medical students participated voluntarily in our study. Randomization did not result in equally skilled groups at baseline, so valid inter-group comparisons were not possible. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 34 students of our intervention group (CST-behav). Five out of seven domains in communication skills as evaluated by independent raters improved significantly, and there was a significant change in the global evaluation by SP.
Although we were unable to make between-group comparisons, the results of the within group pre-post evaluation suggest that specific feedback helps improve communication skills.
反馈被认为是教学沟通技巧的关键要素。然而,在这种情况下,反馈的具体方面并没有得到系统的研究。因此,本研究的目的是调查整合具体、结构化和行为反馈的沟通技巧培训 (CST) 的效果。
我们将反馈的最佳实践建议浓缩在本科医学生的 CST 中,并在一项随机对照试验 (RCT) 中比较了具体、结构化和行为导向的反馈 (干预组 CST-behav) 与一般、经验导向的反馈 (CST-exp. 作为对照组) 的效果。我们通过独立评估者和标准化患者 (SP) 评估沟通技巧的变化。为此,每个学生都在预评估和后评估中进行了录像。
66 名本科医学生自愿参加了我们的研究。随机分组没有导致基线技能水平相等的小组,因此无法进行有效的组间比较。因此,我们分析了干预组 (CST-behav) 34 名学生的结果。独立评估者评估的沟通技巧的七个领域中有五个有显著改善,SP 的整体评估也有显著变化。
尽管我们无法进行组间比较,但组内前后评估的结果表明,具体的反馈有助于提高沟通技巧。