Lefroy Janet, Watling Chris, Teunissen Pim W, Brand Paul
Keele University School of Medicine, Clinical Education Centre RSUH, ST4 6QG, Staffordshire, UK.
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Dec;4(6):284-299. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
The guidelines offered in this paper aim to amalgamate the literature on formative feedback into practical Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows for individual clinical supervisors and for the institutions that support clinical learning.
The authors built consensus by an iterative process. Do's and Don'ts were proposed based on authors' individual teaching experience and awareness of the literature, and the amalgamated set of guidelines were then refined by all authors and the evidence was summarized for each guideline. Don't Knows were identified as being important questions to this international group of educators which if answered would change practice. The criteria for inclusion of evidence for these guidelines were not those of a systematic review, so indicators of strength of these recommendations were developed which combine the evidence with the authors' consensus.
A set of 32 Do and Don't guidelines with the important Don't Knows was compiled along with a summary of the evidence for each. These are divided into guidelines for the individual clinical supervisor giving feedback to their trainee (recommendations about both the process and the content of feedback) and guidelines for the learning culture (what elements of learning culture support the exchange of meaningful feedback, and what elements constrain it?)
Feedback is not easy to get right, but it is essential to learning in medicine, and there is a wealth of evidence supporting the Do's and warning against the Don'ts. Further research into the critical Don't Knows of feedback is required. A new definition is offered: Helpful feedback is a supportive conversation that clarifies the trainee's awareness of their developing competencies, enhances their self-efficacy for making progress, challenges them to set objectives for improvement, and facilitates their development of strategies to enable that improvement to occur.
本文提供的指南旨在将有关形成性反馈的文献整合为针对个体临床督导员以及支持临床学习的机构的实用操作建议、禁忌事项和未知问题。
作者通过反复迭代的过程达成共识。根据作者个人的教学经验和对文献的了解提出操作建议和禁忌事项,然后所有作者对整合后的指南进行完善,并为每条指南总结证据。未知问题被确定为对这个国际教育工作者群体来说很重要的问题,若得到解答将会改变实践。这些指南纳入证据的标准并非系统评价的标准,因此制定了将证据与作者共识相结合的这些建议的强度指标。
汇编了一套包含32条操作建议和禁忌事项以及重要未知问题的指南,并为每条指南附上了证据总结。这些指南分为个体临床督导员向其学员提供反馈的指南(关于反馈过程和内容的建议)以及学习文化指南(学习文化的哪些要素支持有意义的反馈交流,哪些要素对其构成限制?)
反馈不易做好,但对医学学习至关重要,并且有大量证据支持操作建议并警示禁忌事项。需要对反馈方面关键的未知问题进行进一步研究。给出了一个新定义:有益的反馈是一种支持性对话,它能澄清学员对自身能力发展的认识,增强其取得进步的自我效能感,促使他们设定改进目标,并促进他们制定实现改进的策略。