University of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center and Research Center, Bruce W. Carter Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.; Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.130. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
To compare the time-zero load to failure of a quadrupled, single-tendon, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction graft construct with (supplemented) and without the incorporation of inner-limb whipstitch sutures (control) into a tibial suspensory fixation button.
Eight matched pairs of peroneus longus tendons were prepared according to a quadrupled, all-inside ACL soft-tissue graft technique with 1 side serving as a control and the contralateral side supplemented. The constructs were biomechanically tested for strain in the inner and outer limbs during a preconditioning protocol, single-cycle load to failure, and elongation of the whole construct.
Ultimate load to failure was significantly higher in the supplemented group: 797.5 ± 49.6 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 763.13-831.87 N) versus 719.6 ± 69.6 N (95% CI, 671.38-767.82 N; P = .044). Less graft elongation at failure was observed in the supplemented group (3.1 ± 1.5 mm; 95% CI, 2.07-4.17 mm) versus the control group (21.0 ± 21.2 mm; 95% CI, 6.31-35.69 mm; P = .052). The number of grafts undergoing a 5-mm or greater change in length at failure was 1 of 8 in the supplemented group versus 5 of 8 in the control group (P = .038).
Inner-limb supplemental tibial fixation results in higher time-zero load to failure and decreased graft elongation in a quadrupled, single-tendon, all-inside ACL reconstruction graft construct.
The weak point of a single-tendon, quadrupled, all-inside ACL graft construct is the tendon-to-tendon suturing to secure the inner limbs of the graft. Adding supplemental fixation by incorporating the sutures from the inner limb to the tibial suspensory fixation button leads to a higher time-zero load to failure and decreased graft elongation.
比较四股单束全内前交叉韧带(ACL)重建移植物在与(补充)和不包含内置内束鞭缝线(对照)的情况下,与胫骨悬吊固定扣的零时间负荷至失效。
根据四股全内 ACL 软组织移植物技术,准备 8 对匹配的腓肠肌腱,一侧作为对照,对侧作为补充。在预适应方案、单循环负荷至失效和整个移植物伸长过程中,对构建体进行内外束应变的生物力学测试。
补充组的最终失效负荷明显更高:797.5±49.6 N(95%置信区间[CI],763.13-831.87 N)与 719.6±69.6 N(95% CI,771.38-767.82 N;P=.044)。补充组的移植物失效伸长量较小(3.1±1.5 mm;95% CI,2.07-4.17 mm)与对照组(21.0±21.2 mm;95% CI,6.31-35.69 mm;P=.052)。在补充组中,有 1 个移植物在失效时的长度发生了 5 毫米或更大的变化,而在对照组中,有 5 个移植物发生了这种变化(P=.038)。
在四股单束全内 ACL 重建移植物中,内置胫骨固定可增加零时间负荷至失效,并减少移植物伸长。
单束四股全内 ACL 移植物的弱点是肌腱到肌腱的缝合,以固定移植物的内束。通过将内束的缝线纳入胫骨悬吊固定扣,增加补充固定可导致更高的零时间负荷至失效和减少移植物伸长。