Basic Medical College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China.
Traditional Chinese Medical Department of Zunyi Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Zunyi, 563006, Guizhou, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 May;51(5):851-858. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02088-3. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
The efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function remains controversial in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The aim of the present work was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D on vascular function in CKD patients.
We searched Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, the Science Citation Index, and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials comparing vitamin D with a placebo in CKD patients.
We included seven trials. For flow-mediated dilation (FMD), there was no significant difference between the two groups (WMD 1.66%; 95% CI - 0.2 to 3.51, p = 0.08; with significant heterogeneity, p < 0.0001, I = 89%). We conducted a subgroup analysis. In the cholecalciferol group, compared with the placebo group, cholecalciferol significantly increased FMD (WMD 5.49%; 95% CI 4.36-6.62, p < 0.0001). In the 2 ug paricalcitol group, compared with the placebo group, paricalcitol significantly increased FMD (WMD 2.09%; 95% CI 1.28-2.9, p < 0.0001; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.47, I = 0%). In the 1 ug paricalcitol group, there was no significant difference between the two groups. For pulse wave velocity (PWV), vitamin D significantly decreased PWV compared with the placebo (WMD - 0.93 m/s; 95% CI - 1.71 to - 0.15, p = 0.02; without significant heterogeneity, p = 0.14, I = 45%). For calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH), there was a significant difference between the vitamin D group and the placebo group. For 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], there was a significant difference between the inactive vitamin D group and the placebo group. For phosphorus (P), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), there were no significant differences between the two groups.
We speculate that vitamin D might be able to improve vascular function in CKD patients. The effect of vitamin D might be associated with its doses and earlier stages of the disease might respond better to vitamin D. Furthermore, trials with larger populations and longer durations are needed in order to provide more reliable evidence.
维生素 D 对慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者血管功能的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在进行荟萃分析,以评估维生素 D 对 CKD 患者血管功能的疗效。
我们检索了 Medline、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Embase、科学引文索引和临床试验注册库,以比较维生素 D 与 CKD 患者安慰剂的随机对照试验。
我们纳入了 7 项试验。对于血流介导的扩张(FMD),两组之间没有显著差异(WMD 1.66%;95%CI-0.2 至 3.51,p=0.08;存在显著异质性,p<0.0001,I=89%)。我们进行了亚组分析。在胆钙化醇组中,与安慰剂组相比,胆钙化醇显著增加了 FMD(WMD 5.49%;95%CI 4.36-6.62,p<0.0001)。在 2μg 帕立骨化醇组中,与安慰剂组相比,帕立骨化醇显著增加了 FMD(WMD 2.09%;95%CI 1.28-2.9,p<0.0001;无显著异质性,p=0.47,I=0%)。在 1μg 帕立骨化醇组中,两组之间无显著差异。对于脉搏波速度(PWV),与安慰剂相比,维生素 D 显著降低了 PWV(WMD-0.93m/s;95%CI-1.71 至-0.15,p=0.02;无显著异质性,p=0.14,I=45%)。对于钙(Ca)和甲状旁腺激素(PTH),维生素 D 组与安慰剂组之间存在显著差异。对于 25-羟维生素 D[25(OH)D],无活性维生素 D 组与安慰剂组之间存在显著差异。对于磷(P)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP),两组之间无显著差异。
我们推测维生素 D 可能能够改善 CKD 患者的血管功能。维生素 D 的作用可能与其剂量有关,疾病的早期阶段可能对维生素 D 的反应更好。此外,需要进行更大规模和更长时间的试验,以提供更可靠的证据。