Cox Charles S, Juranek Jennifer, Bedi Supinder
Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas.
Transfusion. 2019 Feb;59(S1):858-868. doi: 10.1111/trf.14834.
Clinical trials for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have not successfully produced a new therapeutic for neuroprotection or neurorestoration, despite multiple attempts. Stem cell-based therapies and/or cellular therapies have been developed over the past 20 years such that clinical trials are now in Phase II and III stages for neurologic diseases such as TBI and stroke. Many of the vexing issues from past clinical failures still exist today, namely, preclinical data that may not translate to clinical trial because of design and injury heterogeneity that poorly stratifies enrolled patients. Recognition of these problems has led us to advocate for outcome measures that are clinically meaningful, but do not represent a global functional "score." Specifically, we seek to measure those early physiologically relevant outcomes (intracranial pressure, edema, and therapeutic intensity) and later structural outcomes in regions of interest that are linked to putative mechanisms of action of cell based therapies. Early approval of therapeutics that are successful by these metrics would then allow further access to treatments that could be further tested via patient registries and other surveillance for ultimate adoption. Continuing to do the same thing with each iterative trial will assure the same results.
尽管进行了多次尝试,但创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的临床试验尚未成功研发出一种新的神经保护或神经修复疗法。在过去20年中,基于干细胞的疗法和/或细胞疗法得到了发展,目前针对TBI和中风等神经系统疾病的临床试验已进入II期和III期。过去临床失败中许多棘手的问题至今仍然存在,即由于设计和损伤异质性导致临床前数据可能无法转化为临床试验数据,而异质性使得入组患者分层不佳。对这些问题的认识促使我们提倡采用具有临床意义但不代表整体功能“评分”的结局指标。具体而言,我们试图测量那些早期生理相关结局(颅内压、水肿和治疗强度)以及后期与基于细胞疗法的假定作用机制相关的感兴趣区域的结构结局。通过这些指标成功的疗法早期获批,将使更多患者能够接受治疗,这些治疗可通过患者登记和其他监测手段进一步测试,以供最终采用。在每次迭代试验中都重复同样的做法将确保得到相同的结果。