Suppr超能文献

AWARD-4 研究中基线身体质量指数亚组的事后分析:接受每周一次度拉鲁肽加门冬胰岛素或甘精胰岛素加门冬胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的体重减轻。

Weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving once-weekly dulaglutide plus insulin lispro or insulin glargine plus insulin lispro: A post-hoc analysis of the AWARD-4 study across baseline body mass index subgroups.

机构信息

Diabeteszentrum am Marienplatz, Munich, Germany.

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jun;21(6):1340-1348. doi: 10.1111/dom.13658. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Abstract

AIMS

Insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are challenged in achieving body weight stability or reduction, in addition to glycaemic control. Post-hoc analyses of body weight and insulin dose data from the AWARD-4 trial involved comparison of treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg (N = 295) or 0.75 mg (N = 293) and treatment with daily insulin glargine (N = 296), each with prandial insulin lispro (± metformin).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Changes in weight and in the proportion of patients without weight gain or with weight loss of at least 3%, 5% or 10% or composites of HbA1c less than 7% without weight gain and weight loss of at least 3% after 52 weeks were compared between the dulaglutide (either dose) groups and the insulin glargine group, overall and by baseline BMI (<30, 30-<35, ≥35 kg/m ), using analysis of covariance and logistic regression, including interaction terms.

RESULTS

The following parameters were statistically significant (P < 0.01) in favour of the dulaglutide-treated groups, at lower mean total daily insulin doses, vs the insulin glargine group. The achieved targets were more pronounced with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with insulin glargine: LSM weight change difference, -3.23 kg; proportion of patients without weight gain, 49.0% vs 19.0%; proportion of patients with weight loss ≥3%, 21.7% vs 5.7% or with weight loss ≥5%, 10.5% vs 2.4%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% without weight gain, 26.2% vs 7.9%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% and weight loss ≥3%, 11.9% vs 1.4%, respectively. Treatment effect for these parameters was not significantly different across BMI categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger proportions of patients in late-stage T2D needing treatment intensification achieved glycemic control without weight gain or with weight loss at lower insulin doses with once-weekly dulaglutide plus daily prandial insulin than with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, overall and across all three BMI subgroups.

摘要

目的

接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和肥胖患者在控制血糖的同时,还面临着体重稳定或减轻的挑战。AWARD-4 试验的体重和胰岛素剂量的事后分析比较了每周一次的度拉糖肽 1.5mg(N=295)或 0.75mg(N=293)与每日胰岛素甘精的治疗效果(N=296),同时联合餐时胰岛素赖脯(±二甲双胍)。

材料和方法

比较每周一次的度拉糖肽(任一度量)与每日胰岛素甘精的治疗效果,整体及按基线 BMI(<30、30-<35、≥35kg/m2)比较,52 周后体重变化和无体重增加或体重减轻至少 3%、5%或 10%或 HbA1c<7%且无体重增加和体重减轻至少 3%的患者比例,采用协方差分析和逻辑回归,包括交互项。

结果

与胰岛素甘精组相比,度拉糖肽治疗组在较低的平均总日胰岛素剂量下,以下参数具有统计学意义(P<0.01),更有利于度拉糖肽治疗组:LSM 体重变化差异,-3.23kg;无体重增加的患者比例,49.0%比 19.0%;体重减轻≥3%的患者比例,21.7%比 5.7%或体重减轻≥5%的患者比例,10.5%比 2.4%;无体重增加的 HbA1c<7%的患者比例,26.2%比 7.9%;HbA1c<7%且体重减轻≥3%的患者比例,11.9%比 1.4%。这些参数的治疗效果在 BMI 类别之间没有显著差异。

结论

在需要强化治疗的晚期 T2D 患者中,与基础-餐时胰岛素方案相比,每周一次的度拉糖肽联合每日餐时胰岛素,在较低的胰岛素剂量下,可使更大比例的患者实现血糖控制且不增加体重或减轻体重,整体及所有三个 BMI 亚组均如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验