• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sinorhodeus microlepis 线粒体基因组的异常 AT 偏斜为苦鱼线粒体基因组特征和系统发育意义提供了新的见解。

Unusual AT-skew of Sinorhodeus microlepis mitogenome provides new insights into mitogenome features and phylogenetic implications of bitterling fishes.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, The Innovation Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.

State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, The Innovation Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 May 15;129:339-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.200. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.200
PMID:30738158
Abstract

Sinorhodeus microlepis (S. microlepis) is recently described as a new species and represents a new genus Sinorhodeu of the subfamily Acheilognathinae. In this study, we first sequenced the complete mitogenome of S. microlepis and compared with the other 29 bitterling mitogenomes. The S. microlepis mitogenome is 16,591 bp in length and contains 37 genes. Gene distribution pattern is identical among 30 bitterling mitogenomes. A significant linear correlation between A+T% and AT-skew were found among 29 bitterling mitogenomes, except S. microlepis shows unusual AT-skew with slightly negative in tRNAs and PCGs. Bitterling mitogenomes exhibit highly conserved usage bias of start codon, relative synonymous codons and amino acids, overlaps and non-coding intergenic spacers. Phylogenetic trees constructed by 13 PCGs strongly support the polyphyly of the genus Acheilognathus and the paraphyly of Rhodeus and Tanakia. Together with the unusual characters of S. microlepis mitogenomes and phylogenetic trees, S. microlepis should be a sister species to the genus Rhodeu that might diverge about 13.69 Ma (95% HPD: 12.96-14.48 Ma).

摘要

黄河鱲(S. microlepis)最近被描述为一个新物种,代表了鱲科副鱲亚科的一个新属 Sinorhodeu。在本研究中,我们首次对 S. microlepis 的完整线粒体基因组进行了测序,并与其他 29 种鱲的线粒体基因组进行了比较。S. microlepis 的线粒体基因组长 16591bp,包含 37 个基因。30 种鱲的线粒体基因组基因分布模式相同。在 29 种鱲的线粒体基因组中发现 A+T%和 AT-skew 之间存在显著的线性相关性,但 S. microlepis 的 tRNAs 和 PCGs 中的 AT-skew 呈异常的负偏态分布。鱲的线粒体基因组显示出高度保守的起始密码子、相对同义密码子和氨基酸的使用偏好性、重叠和非编码基因间间隔区。由 13 个 PCGs 构建的系统发育树强烈支持了属 Acheilognathus 的多系性和 Rhodeus 和 Tanakia 的并系性。结合 S. microlepis 线粒体基因组和系统发育树的异常特征,S. microlepis 可能是 Rhodeu 属的姐妹种,它们大约在 13.69 Ma(95%HPD:12.96-14.48 Ma)时分化。

相似文献

1
Unusual AT-skew of Sinorhodeus microlepis mitogenome provides new insights into mitogenome features and phylogenetic implications of bitterling fishes.Sinorhodeus microlepis 线粒体基因组的异常 AT 偏斜为苦鱼线粒体基因组特征和系统发育意义提供了新的见解。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 May 15;129:339-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.200. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Novel insights into adaptive evolution based on the unusual AT-skew in Acheilognathus gracilis mitogenome and phylogenetic relationships of bitterling.基于细鳑鲏线粒体基因组中异常的AT偏斜及苦恶鱼系统发育关系对适应性进化的新见解。
Gene. 2024 Apr 15;902:148154. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148154. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
The complete mitochondrial genome of Amur bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus) from China.来自中国的黑龙江鳑鲏(Rhodeus sericeus)的完整线粒体基因组。
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 Jul;27(4):2377-8. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1028038. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Comparative mitogenome analyses uncover mitogenome features and phylogenetic implications of the subfamily Cobitinae.比较线粒体基因组分析揭示了鳅亚科的线粒体基因组特征及其系统发育意义。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Jan 14;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07360-w.
5
The complete mitochondrial genome of Thitarodes sejilaensis (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae), a host insect of Ophiocordyceps sinensis and its implication in taxonomic revision of Hepialus adopted in China.中华虫草寄主昆虫色季拉虫草蝠蛾(鳞翅目:蝙蝠蛾科)的线粒体全基因组及其在中国蝙蝠蛾属分类修订中的意义
Gene. 2017 Feb 15;601:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.039. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
6
, a new genus and species of bitterling from China (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae).中国苦恶鱼的一个新属和新种(硬骨鱼纲:鲤科:鱊亚科)
Zootaxa. 2017 Nov 22;4353(1):69-88. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4353.1.4.
7
Comparative analysis of seven mitochondrial genomes of Phymatostetha (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) and phylogenetic implications.七种盲蝽科(半翅目:盲蝽科)线粒体基因组的比较分析及系统发育意义。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Mar 15;125:1112-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.174. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Beet Webworm, Spoladea recurvalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Its Phylogenetic Implications.甜菜夜蛾(鳞翅目:草螟科)线粒体全基因组及其系统发育意义
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0129355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129355. eCollection 2015.
9
Three new Diplozoidae mitogenomes expose unusual compositional biases within the Monogenea class: implications for phylogenetic studies.三种新 Diplozoidae 线粒体基因组揭示了单殖吸虫类群中不寻常的组成偏向:对系统发育研究的启示。
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1249-3.
10
Mitochondrial genome of Diaphania indica(saunders) (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and implications for its phylogeny.指示黄脊瘤蛾(鳞翅目:焦蛾科)的线粒体基因组及其系统发育意义。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Mar;108:981-989. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The first complete mitochondrial genome of Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) sheds new light on its phylogenetic position and molecular evolution.凤头鹰(祖氏凤头鹰,波拿巴,1819年)的首个完整线粒体基因组为其系统发育位置和分子进化提供了新线索。
BMC Zool. 2025 Aug 29;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40850-025-00238-y.
2
Insights into the structural features and phylogenetic implications of the complete mitochondrial genome of Fasin rainbow fish (Melanotaenia fasinensis).法西彩虹鱼(Melanotaenia fasinensis)完整线粒体基因组的结构特征及系统发育意义。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Nov 11;25(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10996-7.
3
The First Three Mitochondrial Genomes for the Characterization of the Genus (Hemiptera: Triozidae) and Phylogenetic Implications.
三叶虫科(半翅目:三锥科)属的前三个线粒体基因组特征及系统发育意义。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;15(7):842. doi: 10.3390/genes15070842.
4
Four new complete mitochondrial genomes of Gobioninae fishes (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) and their phylogenetic implications.四种新的鮈亚科鱼类(硬骨鱼纲:鲤科)完整的线粒体基因组及其系统发育意义。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 19;12:e16632. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16632. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparative Mitogenomic Analyses of Darkling Beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Provide Evolutionary Insights into tRNA-like Sequences.黑甲虫(鞘翅目:拟步甲科)的比较线粒体基因组分析为 tRNA 样序列提供了进化见解。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;14(9):1738. doi: 10.3390/genes14091738.
6
Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of the (Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae) Genus Based on Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequences.基于线粒体全基因组序列的(十足目:短尾亚目:地蟹科)地蟹属分子系统发育与进化研究
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;12(7):974. doi: 10.3390/biology12070974.
7
Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Culex vishnui (Diptera: Culicidae), one of the major vectors of Japanese encephalitis virus.描述淡色库蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的完整线粒体基因组,其是日本脑炎病毒的主要传播媒介之一。
Parasitol Res. 2023 Jun;122(6):1403-1414. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07840-4. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Comparative Mitogenome Analyses Uncover Mitogenome Features and Phylogenetic Implications of the Parrotfishes (Perciformes: Scaridae).比较线粒体基因组分析揭示了鹦嘴鱼(鲈形目:鹦嘴鱼科)的线粒体基因组特征及其系统发育意义。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;12(3):410. doi: 10.3390/biology12030410.
9
Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of Two Snake Eels Reveals Irregular Gene Rearrangement and Phylogenetic Implications of Ophichthidae.两种蛇鳗的线粒体基因组比较分析揭示了蛇鳗科不规则的基因重排及系统发育意义。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(3):362. doi: 10.3390/ani13030362.
10
Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Spotted Catfish (Thunberg, 1792) and Its Phylogenetic Implications.斑点叉尾鮰(Thunberg,1792)的线粒体基因组全序列特征及其系统发育意义。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;13(11):2128. doi: 10.3390/genes13112128.