Lim Huei-Wen, Schuster Isaiah P, Rajapakse Ramona, Monzur Farah, Khan Sundas, Sultan Keith
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Intest Res. 2019 Apr;17(2):244-252. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00101. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with concomitant Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is controversial, especially when CDI diagnosis is made by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, which may reflect colonization without infection.
We performed a multicenter review of all inpatients with IBD and PCR diagnosed CDI. Outcomes included length of stay, 30- and 90-day readmission, colectomy during admission and within 3 months, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, CDI relapse and death for patients who received corticosteroid (CS) after CDI diagnosis versus those that did not. Propensity-adjusted regression analysis of outcomes based on CS usage was performed.
We identified 177 IBD patients with CDI, 112 ulcerative colitis and 65 Crohn's disease. For IBD overall, CS after CDI diagnosis was associated with prolonged hospitalization (5.5 days: 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-9.6 days; P=0.008), higher colectomy rate within 3 months (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% CI, 1.1-28.2; P=0.042) and more frequent ICU admissions (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.5-41.6; P=0.017) versus no CS. CS use post-CDI diagnosis in UC patients was associated with prolonged hospitalization (6.2 days: 95% CI, 0.4- 12.0 days; P=0.036) and more frequent ICU admissions (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.1-48.7; P=0.036).
CS use among IBD inpatients with CDI diagnosed by PCR is associated with poorer outcomes and would seem to reinforce the importance of C. difficile toxin assay to help distinguish colonization from infection. This adverse effect appears more prominent among those with UC.
背景/目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)合并艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的最佳管理存在争议,尤其是当CDI诊断通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测做出时,该检测可能反映的是定植而非感染。
我们对所有IBD住院患者及经PCR诊断为CDI的患者进行了多中心回顾。结局指标包括住院时间、30天和90天再入院率、入院期间及3个月内的结肠切除术、重症监护病房(ICU)入住率、CDI复发率以及CDI诊断后接受皮质类固醇(CS)治疗的患者与未接受CS治疗的患者的死亡率。基于CS使用情况对结局进行倾向调整回归分析。
我们确定了177例IBD合并CDI的患者,其中112例为溃疡性结肠炎,65例为克罗恩病。总体而言,对于IBD患者,CDI诊断后使用CS与住院时间延长(5.5天:95%置信区间[CI],1.5 - 9.6天;P = 0.008)、3个月内结肠切除率较高(比值比[OR],5.5;95% CI,1.1 - 28.2;P = 0.042)以及ICU入住更频繁(OR,7.8;95% CI,1.5 - 41.6;P = 0.017)相关,而未使用CS的情况则不然。UC患者CDI诊断后使用CS与住院时间延长(6.2天:95% CI,0.4 - 12.0天;P = 0.036)和ICU入住更频繁(OR,7.4;95% CI,1.1 - 48.7;P = 0.036)相关。
PCR诊断为CDI的IBD住院患者使用CS与较差的结局相关,这似乎强化了艰难梭菌毒素检测对于区分定植与感染的重要性。这种不良影响在UC患者中似乎更为突出。