Suppr超能文献

产品与过程?地貌学在湿地特征描述中的作用。

Product vs. process? The role of geomorphology in wetland characterization.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia; The Kimbell School of Geosciences, Midwestern State University, 3410 Taft Boulevard, Wichita Falls, TX 76308, USA.

Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DB, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 1;663:980-991. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.399. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

Wetland classification has become a primary tool to characterize and inventory wetland landscapes, but wetlands are difficult to classify because they straddle the terrestrial and aquatic boundary and occur in a variety of hydroclimatic and topographic settings. Presently, many ecological wetland classification schemes are focused on the 'hydrogeomorphic' unit, which attempts to account for the physical setting of a wetland. In many cases topographic terms (e.g. flats, slopes) rather than geomorphological terms (e.g. oxbow, floodplain) are used to characterize landforms, and little attempt is made to characterize the process-landform relationships within wetland landscapes. The current misrepresentation of product geomorphology (i.e. topographic rather than landform description) and underrepresentation of process geomorphology (i.e. lacking process-landform relationships) means that many current wetland classification schemes represent an incomplete and static attempt to characterize geomorphologically dynamic wetland landscapes. Here, we use examples from wetlands in the drylands of Africa, Australia, and North America to identify the capacity for adjustment (i.e. form and timescale of adjustment) of wetland landforms and we relate this capacity to the geomorphological concepts of sediment connectivity and landform sensitivity. We highlight how geomorphological insights into process-landform relationships and timescales of landform adjustment can add value to wetland classification efforts, with important implications for wetland management and ecosystem service delivery. We submit that geomorphology has a much larger role to play in wetland characterization and can enhance existing wetland classification schemes. More participation by the geomorphology community in wetland science and more awareness by the ecology community in recognizing and characterizing wetlands as dynamic landscapes will facilitate more effective wetland research and management.

摘要

湿地分类已成为描述和编目湿地景观的主要工具,但湿地难以分类,因为它们横跨陆地和水域边界,存在于多种水热气候和地形环境中。目前,许多生态湿地分类方案侧重于“水文地貌”单元,试图解释湿地的物理环境。在许多情况下,地形术语(如平原、斜坡)而不是地貌术语(如牛轭湖、泛滥平原)用于描述地貌,并且很少尝试描述湿地景观中的过程地貌关系。目前产品地貌(即地形而不是地貌描述)的代表性不足以及过程地貌(即缺乏过程地貌关系)的代表性不足,意味着许多当前的湿地分类方案代表了对地貌动态湿地景观进行特征描述的不完整和静态尝试。在这里,我们使用非洲、澳大利亚和北美的干旱地区湿地的例子来确定湿地地貌的调整能力(即调整的形式和时间尺度),并将其与沉积物连通性和地貌敏感性的地貌学概念联系起来。我们强调了地貌学在过程地貌关系和地貌调整时间尺度方面的见解如何为湿地分类工作增加价值,对湿地管理和生态系统服务提供具有重要意义。我们认为,地貌学在湿地特征描述中可以发挥更大的作用,并可以增强现有的湿地分类方案。地貌学界更多地参与湿地科学研究,以及生态学界更多地认识到并将湿地描述为动态景观,将有助于更有效地进行湿地研究和管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验