Linnaeus Center of Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Immunol. 2019 Jan 25;10:7. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00007. eCollection 2019.
C1q is a valuable biomarker of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The "gold standard" assay, rocket immunoelectrophoresis (RIE), is time-consuming, and thus a shift to soluble immune precipitation techniques such as nephelometry has occurred. However, quantification of C1q with these techniques has been questioned as a result of the antibody binding properties of C1q. In the present work, we have compared results using various techniques (RIE, nephelometry, and ELISA) and have developed and validated a new magnetic bead-based sandwich immunoassay (MBSI). C1q was quantified by nephelometry and the new sandwich immunoassay in 45 serum samples analyzed using RIE. C1q was also assessed in plasma using RIE and sandwich immunoassay in samples from SLE patients with nephritis ( = 69), SLE patients without nephritis ( = 310) as classified by BILAG score, and matched controls ( = 322). In addition, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 31 patients, previously analyzed with ELISA, were also analyzed with the MBSI to test the behavior of this new assay in the lower detection range. We found a strong correlation between the new MBSI, RIE, and ELISA, but not with nephelometry. The MBSI demonstrated lower levels of C1q in SLE patients than in matched controls ( < 0.0001), and patients with nephritis had lower levels than patients without nephritis ( < 0.01). Similarily, RIE showed significant differences between the patient groups ( < 0.0001). An association was also found between the levels of C1q and the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). Furthermore, there was good correlation between the values obtained by MBSI and ELISA, in both serum ( = 0.960) and CSF ( = 0.786), underscoring the ability of both techniques to measure low concentrations of C1q with high accuracy. The sandwich immunoassay correlated well with RIE, but soluble immune precipitation techniques, such as nephelometry, did not appear suitable alternatives, since C1q itself, and possibly anti-C1q antibodies, interfered with the measurements. The new sandwich immunoassay is therefore a good replacement for RIE in monitoring SLE disease activity.
C1q 是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)疾病活动的有价值的生物标志物。“金标准”检测方法火箭免疫电泳(RIE)耗时较长,因此已经转向可溶性免疫沉淀技术,如散射比浊法。然而,由于 C1q 的抗体结合特性,这些技术对 C1q 的定量受到了质疑。在本工作中,我们比较了使用各种技术(RIE、散射比浊法和 ELISA)的结果,并开发和验证了一种新的基于磁珠的夹心免疫测定法(MBSI)。在使用 RIE 分析的 45 份血清样本中,通过散射比浊法和新的夹心免疫测定法对 C1q 进行定量。还使用 RIE 和夹心免疫测定法评估了肾炎患者(n=69)、无肾炎患者(n=310)和匹配对照者(n=322)的血浆中的 C1q。此外,还使用 MBSI 分析了之前用 ELISA 分析的 31 份脑脊液样本,以测试该新测定法在较低检测范围内的行为。我们发现新的 MBSI、RIE 和 ELISA 之间具有很强的相关性,但与散射比浊法没有相关性。MBSI 显示 SLE 患者的 C1q 水平低于匹配对照者(<0.0001),肾炎患者的 C1q 水平低于无肾炎患者(<0.01)。同样,RIE 显示患者组之间存在显著差异(<0.0001)。还发现 C1q 水平与 SLE 疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)之间存在关联。此外,MBSI 和 ELISA 在血清(r=0.960)和脑脊液(r=0.786)中获得的值之间存在良好的相关性,这突出了两种技术测量低浓度 C1q 的高准确性。夹心免疫测定法与 RIE 相关性良好,但可溶性免疫沉淀技术(如散射比浊法)似乎不是合适的替代品,因为 C1q 本身和可能的抗 C1q 抗体会干扰测量。因此,新的夹心免疫测定法是监测 SLE 疾病活动的 RIE 的良好替代品。