• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受生物治疗的常规治疗类风湿关节炎患者中,同时使用甲氨蝶呤治疗可随时间推移获得更好的结果。

Cotreatment with methotrexate in routine care patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving biological treatment yields better outcomes over time.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen - Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):e000836. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000836. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000836
PMID:30740244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6347027/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the effects of methotrexate (MTX) comedication added to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) on disease activity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine care.

METHODS

Patients with RA on treatment with either bDMARDs or conventional synthetic DMARDs were included in this prospective cohort study. The effect of (time-varying) combination therapy with bDMARD and MTX compared with bDMARD monotherapy was tested in longitudinal generalised estimating equation models using as outcomes: (1) the likelihood to be in remission according to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (<2.6) and to the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) (0-30; ≤3), a patient-reported outcome measure about RA symptoms; and (2) DAS28-ESR and RAPID3 as continuous variables. All models were adjusted for potential confounders: age, gender, drugs for comorbidities (yes/no), oral steroids (yes/no) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (yes/no).

RESULTS

In total, 330 patients were included (mean (SD) follow-up; 10.7 (9.7) months). Compared with bDMARD monotherapy, MTX combination therapy was significantly associated with a 55% higher likelihood to be in DAS28 remission, but not RAPID3 remission, over time. Combination therapy resulted in slightly, but statistically significant, lower levels of DAS28-ESR over time (β=-0.42 (95% CI -0.67 to - 0.17)), but not RAPID3 (β=-0.58 (95% CI -0.65 to 0.49)). The effect on DAS28-ESR was entirely explained by lower swollen joint counts and was persistent after correction for confounders.

CONCLUSION

These results give support to the policy that MTX should be continued in routine care patients with RA on biological therapy since this leads to better objective but not subjective clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估在常规治疗中,甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者疾病活动指标的影响。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究纳入了接受 bDMARD 或传统合成 DMARD 治疗的 RA 患者。使用纵向广义估计方程模型检验 bDMARD 和 MTX(时变)联合治疗与 bDMARD 单药治疗相比的效果,结局为:(1)根据 28 关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)红细胞沉降率(ESR)(<2.6)和常规评估患者指数数据 3(RAPID3)(0-30;≤3)判断的缓解可能性,RAPID3 是一种关于 RA 症状的患者报告结局测量;(2)DAS28-ESR 和 RAPID3 作为连续变量。所有模型均调整了潜在混杂因素:年龄、性别、合并症药物(是/否)、口服类固醇(是/否)和非甾体抗炎药(是/否)。

结果

共纳入 330 例患者(平均(SD)随访时间;10.7(9.7)个月)。与 bDMARD 单药治疗相比,MTX 联合治疗与 DAS28 缓解的可能性在时间上显著增加 55%,但与 RAPID3 缓解无关。联合治疗在时间上导致 DAS28-ESR 略有但具有统计学意义的降低(β=-0.42(95%CI-0.67 至-0.17)),但对 RAPID3 没有影响(β=-0.58(95%CI-0.65 至 0.49))。这种对 DAS28-ESR 的影响完全由肿胀关节计数的降低解释,并且在纠正混杂因素后仍然存在。

结论

这些结果支持在接受生物治疗的 RA 常规治疗患者中继续使用 MTX 的政策,因为这可以带来更好的客观但非主观的临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d4/6347027/2cc166feda81/rmdopen-2018-000836f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d4/6347027/2cc166feda81/rmdopen-2018-000836f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d4/6347027/2cc166feda81/rmdopen-2018-000836f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Cotreatment with methotrexate in routine care patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving biological treatment yields better outcomes over time.在接受生物治疗的常规治疗类风湿关节炎患者中,同时使用甲氨蝶呤治疗可随时间推移获得更好的结果。
RMD Open. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):e000836. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000836. eCollection 2019.
2
Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) alone is insufficient to monitor disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice.在临床实践中,仅常规评估患者指数数据 3(RAPID3)不足以监测类风湿关节炎的疾病活动度。
RMD Open. 2019 Nov 28;5(2):e001050. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001050. eCollection 2019.
3
When to adjust therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initiation of etanercept plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: findings from a randomized study (COMET).类风湿关节炎患者在开始使用依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤或仅使用甲氨蝶呤后何时调整治疗:一项随机研究(COMET)的结果
J Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;41(10):1922-34. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131238. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
4
Assessments of the unmet need in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from the NOR-DMARD registry.评估类风湿关节炎患者管理中未满足的需求:来自 NOR-DMARD 登记处的分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):481-491. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key338.
5
Inhibition of radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients in DAS28 remission using single- or combined with methotrexate non biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中,使用单药或联合甲氨蝶呤的非生物改善病情抗风湿药物疗法抑制处于DAS28缓解状态的类风湿关节炎患者的影像学关节损伤。
Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):50-5. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.924385. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
6
Meta-Regression of a Dose-Response Relationship of Methotrexate in Mono- and Combination Therapy in Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.甲氨蝶呤在未使用改善病情抗风湿药物的早期类风湿关节炎患者单药及联合治疗中的剂量反应关系的Meta回归分析
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1473-1483. doi: 10.1002/acr.23164. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
The Effect of Reduced or Withdrawn Etanercept-methotrexate Therapy on Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.减少或停用依那西普-甲氨蝶呤疗法对早期类风湿关节炎患者报告结局的影响。
J Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;43(7):1268-77. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151179. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3) severity categories and response criteria: Similar results to DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) in the RAPID 1 (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage) clinical trial of certolizumab pegol.RAPID3(患者指数数据 3 的常规评估)严重程度分类和反应标准:在 certolizumab pegol 的 RAPID 1(类风湿关节炎预防结构性损伤)临床试验中,与 DAS28(疾病活动评分)和 CDAI(临床疾病活动指数)相似的结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1142-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20481.
9
Prediction of DAS28-ESR remission at 6 months by baseline variables in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept in Japanese population.在接受依那西普治疗的日本类风湿关节炎患者中,基于基线变量预测 6 个月时 DAS28-ESR 缓解率。
Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(5):488-92. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0187-8. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
10
Short-term efficacy of etanercept plus methotrexate vs combinations of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with methotrexate in established rheumatoid arthritis.依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤与改善病情抗风湿药联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的短期疗效比较
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Nov;53(11):1984-93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu235. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who are Insufficient Responders to Conventional Anti-Rheumatic Drugs.生物制剂或 Janus 激酶抑制剂在常规抗风湿药物反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者中的应用。
Drugs. 2024 Aug;84(8):877-894. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02059-8. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) alone is insufficient to monitor disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice.在临床实践中,仅常规评估患者指数数据 3(RAPID3)不足以监测类风湿关节炎的疾病活动度。
RMD Open. 2019 Nov 28;5(2):e001050. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001050. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Response to: 'Dual target strategy: a proposal to mitigate the risk of overtreatment and enhance patient satisfaction in rheumatoid arthritis' by Ferreira .对费雷拉所著《双重目标策略:降低类风湿关节炎过度治疗风险并提高患者满意度的建议》的回应
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):e110. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214221. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
2
Dual target strategy: a proposal to mitigate the risk of overtreatment and enhance patient satisfaction in rheumatoid arthritis.双重靶点策略:一项降低类风湿关节炎过度治疗风险并提高患者满意度的提议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):e109. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214199. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
生物制剂改善病情抗风湿药的疗效:系统文献回顾为 2016 年更新 EULAR 类风湿关节炎管理建议提供依据。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1113-1136. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210713. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
4
Efficacy and effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in randomized controlled trials and routine clinical practice.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂在类风湿关节炎治疗中的疗效及有效性:随机对照试验与常规临床实践
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 May 1;56(5):725-735. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew467.
5
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Effectiveness of biologic DMARDs in monotherapy versus in combination with synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry.生物 DMARDs 单药治疗与联合合成 DMARDs 治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效:来自瑞士临床质量管理登记处的数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Sep;54(9):1664-72. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev019. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
Prevalence of comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis and evaluation of their monitoring: results of an international, cross-sectional study (COMORA).类风湿关节炎合并症的患病率及其监测评估:一项国际横断面研究(COMORA)的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):62-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204223. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
8
Biologic and oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎的生物制剂和口服改善病情抗风湿药物单药治疗。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Dec;72(12):1897-904. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203485. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
9
Trends in the use of biologic agents among rheumatoid arthritis patients enrolled in the US medicare program.美国医疗保险计划中类风湿关节炎患者使用生物制剂的趋势。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Nov;65(11):1743-51. doi: 10.1002/acr.22055.
10
RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire): agreement with DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) activity categories, scored in five versus more than ninety seconds.快速 3 号(患者指数数据常规评估)对 MDHAQ(多维健康评估问卷)的评估:在五秒与九十秒以上评分时,与 DAS28(疾病活动评分)和 CDAI(临床疾病活动指数)活动分类的一致性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Feb;62(2):181-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20066.