Suppr超能文献

RAPID3(患者指数数据 3 的常规评估)严重程度分类和反应标准:在 certolizumab pegol 的 RAPID 1(类风湿关节炎预防结构性损伤)临床试验中,与 DAS28(疾病活动评分)和 CDAI(临床疾病活动指数)相似的结果。

RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3) severity categories and response criteria: Similar results to DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) in the RAPID 1 (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage) clinical trial of certolizumab pegol.

机构信息

New York University School of Medicine and New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1142-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20481.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare categories for activity/severity according to the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), an index without formal joint counts calculated in 5 versus >100 seconds, as well as the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)- DAS28 and the RAPID3 response criteria, in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage (RAPID 1) clinical trial of certolizumab pegol (CZP).

METHODS

Post hoc analyses were performed using correlations, cross-tabulations, and kappa statistics. Patients (treated with CZP plus methotrexate [MTX] or placebo plus MTX) were classified at baseline and at 52 weeks as high, moderate, low activity/severity or remission, according to the DAS28 (>5.1, >3.2 to ≤5.1, 2.6 to ≤3.2, <2.6 [total range 0-10]), the CDAI (>22, >10 to ≤22, >2.8 to ≤10, ≤2.8 [total range 0-76]), and RAPID3 (>12, >6 to ≤12, >3 to ≤6, ≤3 [total range 0-30]), as well as for good, moderate, and poor EULAR-DAS28 and proposed RAPID3 response criteria.

RESULTS

All measures were correlated significantly: RAPID3 with DAS28 and CDAI (rho > 0.7), higher than erythrocyte sedimentation rate with C-reactive protein level (rho = 0.47). At 52 weeks, DAS28, CDAI, and RAPID3 low activity/remission was seen in 30%, 44%, and 42% of CZP-treated patients versus 3%, 7%, and 10% of control patients. Good, moderate, and poor EULAR-DAS28 responses were seen in 30%, 51%, and 19% of CZP-treated patients versus 3%, 28%, and 70% of control patients, and for RAPID3 in 39%, 30%, and 32% of CZP-treated patients versus 8%, 16%, and 76% of control patients. Kappa and weighted kappa values ranged from 0.36-0.53, indicating fair to moderate agreement.

CONCLUSION

RAPID3, DAS28, and CDAI give similar results to distinguish CZP patients from controls in the RAPID 1 clinical trial. DAS28 is specific for clinical trials; RAPID3 appears pragmatically useful for usual care.

摘要

目的

比较疾病活动评分 28 关节计数(DAS28)、临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)和常规评估患者指数数据 3(RAPID3)的活动/严重程度分类,RAPID3 是一个不包含正式关节计数的指数,计算时间为 5 秒或>100 秒,以及欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)-DAS28 和 RAPID3 反应标准,在 certolizumab pegol(CZP)的类风湿关节炎预防结构损伤(RAPID 1)临床试验中。

方法

采用相关性、交叉表和kappa 统计进行事后分析。根据 DAS28(>5.1、>3.2 至≤5.1、2.6 至≤3.2、<2.6[总范围 0-10])、CDAI(>22、>10 至≤22、>2.8 至≤10、≤2.8[总范围 0-76])和 RAPID3(>12、>6 至≤12、>3 至≤6、≤3[总范围 0-30]),将接受 CZP 加甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或安慰剂加 MTX 治疗的患者(基线和 52 周)分为高、中、低活动/严重程度或缓解,以及良好、中度和不良 EULAR-DAS28 和拟议的 RAPID3 反应标准。

结果

所有指标均呈显著相关性:RAPID3 与 DAS28 和 CDAI(rho>0.7),高于红细胞沉降率与 C 反应蛋白水平(rho=0.47)。在 52 周时,30%、44%和 42%的 CZP 治疗患者达到 DAS28、CDAI 和 RAPID3 低活动/缓解,而对照组患者为 3%、7%和 10%。30%、51%和 19%的 CZP 治疗患者达到良好、中度和不良 EULAR-DAS28 反应,而对照组患者为 3%、28%和 70%,RAPID3 治疗患者为 39%、30%和 32%,对照组患者为 8%、16%和 76%。kappa 和加权 kappa 值范围为 0.36-0.53,表明一致性为中等至良好。

结论

RAPID3、DAS28 和 CDAI 可提供类似的结果,以区分 RAPID 1 临床试验中 CZP 患者与对照组患者。DAS28 适用于临床试验;RAPID3 似乎在常规护理中具有实际用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验