Goodman Jay I
Michigan State University Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology East Lansing, Michigan 48824 USA.
Curr Opin Toxicol. 2017 Apr;3:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 5.
The rapidly evolving field of epigenetic regulation of gene expression is having an impact across the spectrum of biomedical research. Toxicologists have embraced this area as evidenced by their increasing focus on discerning potential epigenetic mechanisms underlying mechanisms by which chemical and physical agents might cause toxicity. It is not surprising that an interest in epigenetic mechanisms of toxicity would lead to a desire to incorporate an epigenetic component into safety assessment. However, premature movement in this direction carries the risk of imposing more confusion than light. This commentary provides an overview of epigenetics, with an emphasis on how the various epigenetic parameters are integrated, as a basis for understanding the complexity behind the desire to include epigenetic evaluations in safety evaluations. Basically, we have much more to learn before turning the goal into a reality. However, considerable progress has been made with regard to using epigenetic profiles as signatures of xenobiotic exposure.
基因表达表观遗传调控这一快速发展的领域正在对生物医学研究的各个方面产生影响。毒理学家已经涉足这一领域,这从他们越来越关注识别化学和物理因素可能导致毒性的潜在表观遗传机制中可见一斑。对毒性表观遗传机制的兴趣会引发将表观遗传成分纳入安全性评估的愿望,这并不奇怪。然而,过早朝着这个方向行动可能带来更多困惑而非明晰。本评论概述了表观遗传学,重点在于各种表观遗传参数是如何整合的,以此作为理解在安全性评估中纳入表观遗传评估背后复杂性的基础。基本上,在将这一目标变为现实之前,我们还有很多需要学习的。不过,在将表观遗传谱用作异源物质暴露的特征方面已经取得了相当大的进展。