• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盲人摸象:元分析 30 年。

The Blind Men and the Elephant: Meta-Ethnography 30 Years On.

机构信息

1 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

2 The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2019 Sep;29(11):1674-1681. doi: 10.1177/1049732319826061. Epub 2019 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/1049732319826061
PMID:30741098
Abstract

In the 30 years since its introduction, meta-ethnography has become a critical tool for synthesizing qualitative health research and providing a holistic understanding of complex health and social phenomena. Meta-ethnography has also been adapted to integrate a wider range of research methodologies, expanded to include a detailed taxonomy of research methods, and has led to the development of multiple other methods of synthesis. In this article, we describe the development of meta-ethnography, its unique research approaches, the innovations that have occurred since its inception, and potential future directions for the method. These include the need for consensus around the role of systematic database searches and critical appraisal, and a clearer path to action for clinicians interpreting qualitative research. Understanding and updating methods such as meta-ethnography will ensure that the exponentially developing field of qualitative research continues to have a meaningful and cumulative impact on complex issues of health and well-being.

摘要

自引入以来的 30 年中,元分析已成为综合定性健康研究并提供对复杂健康和社会现象的整体理解的重要工具。元分析也已被改编为纳入更广泛的研究方法,扩展到包括详细的研究方法分类,并且已经导致了多种其他综合方法的发展。在本文中,我们描述了元分析的发展,其独特的研究方法,自成立以来发生的创新以及该方法的潜在未来方向。其中包括需要就系统数据库搜索和批判性评估的作用达成共识,以及为解释定性研究的临床医生提供更清晰的行动途径。理解和更新元分析等方法将确保定性研究这一呈指数级发展的领域继续对健康和福祉的复杂问题产生有意义和累积的影响。

相似文献

1
The Blind Men and the Elephant: Meta-Ethnography 30 Years On.盲人摸象:元分析 30 年。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Sep;29(11):1674-1681. doi: 10.1177/1049732319826061. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
2
Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research.评价元民族志学:定性研究的系统分析与综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(43):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta15430.
3
A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases.元民族志方法学系统综述,以明确复杂的分析阶段。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7.
4
Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis.何时以及如何更新元民族志定性综合研究,以及为何要这样做。
Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 15;5:44. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4.
5
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告质量:eMERGe 报告指南。
Psychooncology. 2019 Mar;28(3):447-458. doi: 10.1002/pon.4915. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
6
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in evidence synthesis: how the PatMed study approached embedding audience responses into the expression of a meta-ethnography.患者和公众参与(PPI)在证据综合中的应用:PatMed 研究如何将受众反馈纳入元分析表达的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0918-2.
7
Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe).制定方案的元民族志报告指南(eMERGe)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Nov 25;15:103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0068-0.
8
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告:eMERGe 报告指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0.
9
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告质量:eMERGe 报告指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1126-1139. doi: 10.1111/jan.13809. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
10
Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis.医疗保健研究中的元民族志:文献综合的元民族志方法使用指南。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06049-w.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the ethical issues related to telerehabilitation? A critical interpretive synthesis protocol.与远程康复相关的伦理问题有哪些?一项批判性解释性综合方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e099728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099728.
2
Participatory research approaches in long-term care facilities for older adults: a meta-ethnography.参与式研究方法在老年人长期护理机构中的应用:荟萃民族志研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2431449. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2431449. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
3
Mental health and psychosocial support programmes for displaced populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review of process, perspectives and experiences.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)流离失所人群的心理健康和社会心理支持项目:过程、观点与经验的系统综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 May 6;11:e62. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.56. eCollection 2024.
4
Social dignity for marginalized people in public healthcare: an interpretive review and building blocks for a non-ideal theory.公共医疗中边缘人群的社会尊严:一种解释性综述和非理想理论的构建模块。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09987-8. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
How Participatory Music Engagement Supports Mental Well-being: A Meta-Ethnography.参与式音乐活动如何促进心理健康:元民族志研究。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Oct;30(12):1924-1940. doi: 10.1177/1049732320944142. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
What is the qualitative evidence concerning the risks, diagnosis, management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the community in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta-ethnography.在英国社区中,关于胃肠道感染的风险、诊断、管理和后果的定性证据是什么?一项系统评价和荟萃民族志研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):e0227630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227630. eCollection 2020.