• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行性肾内手术或经皮肾镜取石术:哪一种对小儿患者 1 - 2 厘米肾结石更有效?

Retrograde intrarenal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Which one is more effective for 1-2 cm renal stones in pediatric patients?

作者信息

Sarikaya Selcuk, Ebiloglu Turgay, Selvi Ismail, Faruk Bozkurt Omer, Senocak Cagri

机构信息

Gulhane Research and Training Hospital. Department of Urology. Ankara. Turkey.

Kecioren Research and Training Hospital. Department of Urology. Ankara. Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Jan;72(1):54-60.

PMID:30741653
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Urinary stone diseaseis less common in pediatric age group and it has anincreasing incidence. In this study, our hypothesis is toevaluate if one of the techniques, PNL or RIRS is superiorthan the other in terms of stone free status (SFR), fluoroscopytime (FT), operation time (OT), complication rate(CR), JJ stent insertion rate, and hospitalization duration(HD) in children.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 74 patients(under 18 years- old) were operated for the treatmentof renal stones between 1-2cm size. 37 patientswere male (50%) and 37 of them (50%) were female.The study shows the experience of a single center. Dataof the patients who underwent (surgery) were recorded.

RESULTS

SFR was not different in both groups in shortand long terms follow up, but hgb drop, FT, OT, andHD were detected to be worse in PNL group. Therewas lower complication rates for RIRS group comparing to PCNL group according to Clavien classification butgrade I complications were higher in RIRS group.

CONCLUSION

Although PNL is a cheaper treatmentmethod, RIRS has less creatinine change, less FT, lessOT, less CR, less HT with similar SFR for 1-2cm renalstones in children. Long term SFR were 83.8% for RIRSand 86.5% for PCNL. RIRS is a treatment of choice inchildren with 1-2 cm renal stones as it has more advantagesbut the costs must be considered.

摘要

引言

小儿尿石症在儿科年龄组中不太常见,但其发病率呈上升趋势。在本研究中,我们的假设是评估经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)这两种技术在儿童结石清除状态(SFR)、透视时间(FT)、手术时间(OT)、并发症发生率(CR)、双J管置入率和住院时间(HD)方面是否优于另一种技术。

方法

2013年至2016年期间,74例(18岁以下)患者接受了1 - 2厘米大小肾结石的手术治疗。37例患者为男性(50%),37例(50%)为女性。该研究展示了单一中心的经验。记录了接受(手术)患者的数据。

结果

在短期和长期随访中,两组的结石清除率无差异,但PNL组的血红蛋白下降、透视时间、手术时间和住院时间更差。根据Clavien分类,RIRS组的并发症发生率低于经皮肾镜取石术组,但RIRS组的I级并发症更高。

结论

尽管经皮肾镜取石术是一种成本较低的治疗方法,但对于儿童1 - 2厘米肾结石,逆行肾内手术的肌酐变化更小、透视时间更短、手术时间更短、并发症更少、住院时间更短,且结石清除率相似。逆行肾内手术的长期结石清除率为83.8%,经皮肾镜取石术为86.5%。逆行肾内手术因其具有更多优势,是治疗1 - 2厘米肾结石儿童的首选治疗方法,但必须考虑成本。

相似文献

1
Retrograde intrarenal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Which one is more effective for 1-2 cm renal stones in pediatric patients?逆行性肾内手术或经皮肾镜取石术:哪一种对小儿患者 1 - 2 厘米肾结石更有效?
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Jan;72(1):54-60.
2
[Mini-PCNL, micro-PCNL or RIRS: comparative efficacy and safety in renal stones up to 2 cm].[微创经皮肾镜取石术、微通道经皮肾镜取石术或逆行肾盂内切开术:2厘米以下肾结石的疗效与安全性比较]
Urologiia. 2023 Sep(4):98-104.
3
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: Which is more effective for 10-20 mm renal stones in children?微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术的比较:哪种方法对儿童10 - 20毫米肾结石更有效?
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Sep;73(7):643-650.
4
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney.倾向评分匹配分析:比较逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾患者的大结石
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):198-204. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0482.
5
A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≥2厘米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Jan 18;14(1):2949-2954.
6
Use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in pediatric kidney stones.经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)与逆行输尿管软镜碎石术(RIRS)治疗儿童肾结石的比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3083-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04186-x. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
7
Comparing micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating 1-2 cm solitary renal stones in pediatric patients younger than 3 years.比较微经皮肾镜碎石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗 3 岁以下儿童 1-2cm 单发肾结石。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):517.e1-517.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm.2-3cm 肾盂结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):605-609. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0860. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.
10
Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial.超微经皮肾镜取石术(SMP)与逆行性肾内手术治疗 1-2cm 下极肾结石:一项国际多中心随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14427. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of two methods for treatment of 1-2 cm kidney stones in pediatric patients: mini PCNL and RIRS.两种方法治疗小儿 1-2cm 肾结石的比较:微通道经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管软镜碎石术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 8;409(1):207. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03402-z.