Cruz L, Cruz J, Eloy M, Oliveira H, Vaz H, Tenreiro R
Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, Unidade de Investigação de Protecção de Plantas, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-018, Lisboa, Portugal and Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Center for Biodiversity Integrative and Functional Genomics (BioFIG), Ed. ICAT, Campus da FCUL, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, Unidade de Investigação de Protecção de Plantas, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-018, Lisboa, Portugal.
Plant Dis. 2010 Dec;94(12):1504. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-10-0415.
Protected and open field tomato crops are economically important for Portuguese agriculture. In 1983, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Okabe, 1933) Young, Dye & Wilkie, 1978 was first reported affecting protected crops (3) and then later under open field conditions (1). In the 2009 spring/summer season, several outbreaks of bacterial speck of tomato showing an unusual degree of severity were observed in open fields from the Tagus Valley Region. Typical symptoms included necrotic specks surrounded by a yellow halo on younger and older leaves with losses higher than 60% due to the heavy floral bud abortion. Abnormal lesions on the stems, as well as on the petioles and fruits, together with reduced growth of the entire plant, which is normally uncommon, were frequently observed in affected plants from distinct tomato cultivars (H-9665, H-9776, and CDX 255), two of them carrying the Pto resistance gene. Samples collected from different fields and cultivars were observed and used for isolation of the causal agent on King's medium B. The isolates were characterized (2) and Koch's postulates were fulfilled by carrying out pathogenicity tests. Ten plants from three commercial cultivars carrying the Pto resistance gene (CXD 255, Defender F1, and H-9775) were inoculated by spraying bacterial water suspensions (10 CFU ml) and kept under environmental conditions favorable for disease development. Positive and negative controls were also performed using P. syringae pv. tomato type strain (CFBP 2212T; race 0) and sterile distilled water, respectively. Cultural and biochemical characterization of the isolates showed their ability to produce levan, use sucrose, and induce a hypersensitivity reaction on tobacco leaves. Moreover, the isolates were oxidase negative, did not hydrolyze arginine nor produce soft rot on potato slices, and did not use erythritol as well as dl-lactate, identifying them as P. syringae pv. tomato. Typical and severe bacterial speck symptoms were produced in the Pto resistant tomato plants 4 days after inoculation and the isolates could be recovered after reisolation. Negative control plants showed no disease symptoms and CFBP 2212 was unable to produce typical lesions, except for a few in the older leaves. Altogether these results pointed to P. syringae pv. tomato race 1 as the disease causative agent. Further confirmation was achieved by partial sequencing of the rpoD gene using primers PsrpoD FNP1 and PsrpoDnprpcr1 (4). rpoD sequences, obtained from two isolates (CPBF 1288, GenBank HM368535; CPBF 1290, GenBank HM368537), were compared by nucleotide BLAST at NCBI displaying a 100% level of DNA similarity with strain Pto T1 belonging to P. syringae pv. tomato race 1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the occurrence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato race 1 in Portugal. References: (1) L. Cruz et al. ATTI Giornate Fitopatol, 2:399, 1992. (2) R. Lelliott and D. Stead. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1987. (3) H. Oliveira and J. Santa-Marta. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Okabe, 1933) Young, Dye & Wilkie, 1978. Uma nova bacteriose do tomateiro em Portugal. Publicação do Laboratório de Patologia Vegetal "Veríssimo de Almeida", 1983. (4). S. Sarkar et al. Genetics 174:1041, 2006.
保护地和露地番茄作物对葡萄牙农业具有重要的经济意义。1983年,首次报道丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种(冈部,1933年;扬、戴伊和威尔基,1978年)影响保护地作物(3),随后又报道其在露地条件下发病(1)。在2009年春夏季,塔霍河谷地区的露地番茄出现了几起细菌性斑点病暴发,病情严重程度异常。典型症状包括在较嫩和较老叶片上出现坏死斑点,周围有黄色晕圈,由于花芽大量败育,损失率高于60%。在不同番茄品种(H - 9665、H - 9776和CDX 255)的患病植株中,经常观察到茎、叶柄和果实上出现异常病斑,以及整株植物生长受抑制的情况,而这通常并不常见,其中两个品种携带Pto抗性基因。从不同田地和品种采集的样本进行了观察,并用于在King氏培养基B上分离病原菌。对分离菌株进行了鉴定(2),并通过致病性试验满足了科赫法则。对三个携带Pto抗性基因的商业品种(CXD 255、Defender F1和H - 9775)的10株植株喷施细菌水悬液(10 CFU/ml)进行接种,并置于有利于病害发展的环境条件下。分别使用丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种模式菌株(CFBP 2212T;0号小种)和无菌蒸馏水进行阳性和阴性对照。对分离菌株的培养和生化特性分析表明,它们能够产生果聚糖、利用蔗糖,并在烟草叶片上诱导过敏反应。此外,分离菌株氧化酶阴性,不水解精氨酸,在马铃薯切片上不产生软腐,也不利用赤藓醇和dl - 乳酸,鉴定为丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种。接种后4天,携带Pto抗性的番茄植株出现典型且严重的细菌性斑点症状,重新分离后可再次获得分离菌株。阴性对照植株未出现病害症状,CFBP 2212除在较老叶片上出现少数病斑外,无法产生典型病斑。总之,这些结果表明丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种1号小种是致病因子。通过使用引物PsrpoD FNP1和PsrpoDnprpcr1对rpoD基因进行部分测序(4)进一步证实了这一结果。从两个分离菌株(CPBF 1288,GenBank HM36853;CPBF 1290,GenBank HM368537)获得的rpoD序列,在NCBI上通过核苷酸BLAST进行比较,显示与属于丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种1号小种菌株Pto T1的DNA相似性为100%。据我们所知,这是葡萄牙首次报道丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种1号小种的发生情况。参考文献:(1)L. Cruz等人,《植物病理学会议论文集》,2:399,1992年。(2)R. Lelliott和D. Stead,《植物细菌病害诊断方法》,布莱克韦尔科学出版社,牛津,1987年。(3)H. Oliveira和J. Santa - Marta,《丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种(冈部,1933年;扬、戴伊和威尔基,1978年)。葡萄牙番茄的一种新细菌病害》,植物病理学“维里西莫·德·阿尔梅达”实验室出版物,1983年。(4)S. Sarkar等人,《遗传学》,174:1041,2006年。