Korres A M N, Ventura J A, Fernandes P M B
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo, Av. Vitória, 1729, Vitória-ES, Brazil.
Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural, Rua Afonso Sarlo 160, Vitória-ES, 29052-010, Brazil.
Plant Dis. 2010 Dec;94(12):1509. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-10-0276.
In rainy and warm periods of the year, after a dry, hot season (December/March), commercially grown pineapple (Ananas comosus var. comosus) in Espírito Santo State, Brazil has been affected by fruit collapse disease with significant commercial losses (15 to 20%) each year. Symptoms include intense flesh fermentation, spontaneous exudation of liquid and froth, and ripe inner fruit tissue deterioration on plants and postharvest. Isolation of microorganisms of diseased fruits on nutrient agar, potato dextrose agar, and yeast extract peptone dextrose media consistently resulted in the recovery of a bacterium and three different yeasts. Koch's postulates were fulfilled by syringe inoculation of different concentrations of each microorganism (2.0 × 10 to 2.0 × 10 CFU/ml) singly and the organisms in combinations (only bacterium, only the yeasts, one yeast and the bacterium, two yeasts and the bacterium, and three yeasts and the bacterium) into disinfected (0.5% NaOCl) postharvest ripe pineapple fruits (cv. Pérola). Inoculated fruits were kept at 40°C for 5 days. Six fruits were used for each treatment and the experiment was repeated three times. Characteristic symptoms only occurred when all three yeasts and the bacterium were inoculated in combination at all inoculum concentrations. Each microorganism alone could not produce symptoms. Control fruits, inoculated with sterile water, did not develop disease symptoms. Cultures of each isolate were obtained and identified by morphological, physiological, biochemical, and genetic analyses. Molecular characterization by ribosomal sequence analyses of bacterium (16S rDNA) and yeasts (D1/D2 region of 26S rDNA) used universal PCR primers for bacteria (F968 and R1401) and yeast NL1 (5' GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG 3') and NL4 (5' GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G 3'). Sequences were compared with those in GenBank. On the basis of the results, the bacterium was identified as a Klebsiella sp. and the yeasts as a Candida sp., Saccharomyces sp., and a Kloeckera sp. The bacterium was negative for protease, cellulase, and pectinase activity in the qualitative tests. We concluded that the combination of a Klebsiella sp. with the three yeasts, Candida sp., Saccharomyces sp., and Kloeckera sp., was responsible for the symptoms of pineapple fruit collapse. Symptoms of pineapple fruit collapse are similar to yeasty fermentation reported previously (2,3). These reports did not consider the interaction of yeast and bacteria. No relationship between the pineapple cultivars and the pathogens from specific field sites was found. Disease outbreaks seem related to naturally occurring fruit translucency, a physiological disturbance correlated with calcium, potassium, and nitrogen balance (1,3), which increases fruit cell-wall hydrolases and membrane permeability. This condition releases nutrients from the fruit and favors microbial growth. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a combination of bacterium and yeasts associated with collapse disease of pineapple in Brazil. Information on the pathogens responsible for collapse disease epidemics in Espírito Santo fields will be useful in breeding and disease control strategies. References: (1) R. P. Haff et al. J. Food Process. Preserv. 30:527, 2006. (2) C. Py et al. The Pineapple: Cultivation and Uses. Larose, Paris, 1987. (3) K. G. Rohrbach and M. Johnson. The Pineapple: Botany, Production and Uses. D. P. Bartholomew et al., eds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 2003.
在巴西圣埃斯皮里图州,经过干燥炎热的季节(12月/3月)后,每年的雨季和温暖时期,商业化种植的菠萝(Ananas comosus var. comosus)都会受到果实萎蔫病的影响,每年造成重大商业损失(15%至20%)。症状包括果肉强烈发酵、液体和泡沫的自发渗出,以及植株上和采后果实内部成熟组织的变质。在营养琼脂、马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂和酵母提取物蛋白胨葡萄糖培养基上对患病果实的微生物进行分离,始终能分离出一种细菌和三种不同的酵母。通过将每种微生物的不同浓度(2.0×10至2.0×10 CFU/ml)单独以及组合(仅细菌、仅酵母、一种酵母和细菌、两种酵母和细菌、三种酵母和细菌)用注射器接种到消毒过的(0.5%次氯酸钠)采后成熟菠萝果实(品种佩罗拉)中,柯赫氏法则得到了验证。接种后的果实置于40°C下5天。每种处理使用6个果实,实验重复3次。只有当所有三种酵母和细菌以所有接种浓度组合接种时才会出现特征性症状。每种微生物单独接种均不能产生症状。接种无菌水的对照果实未出现病害症状。通过形态学、生理学、生化和遗传学分析获得并鉴定了每种分离物的培养物。通过对细菌(16S rDNA)和酵母(26S rDNA的D1/D2区域)的核糖体序列分析进行分子鉴定,使用了针对细菌的通用PCR引物(F968和R1401)以及酵母NL1(5' GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG 3')和NL4(5' GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G 3')。将序列与GenBank中的序列进行比较。根据结果,该细菌被鉴定为克雷伯氏菌属的一种,酵母分别为念珠菌属、酿酒酵母属和克勒克酵母属的一种。在定性试验中,该细菌的蛋白酶、纤维素酶和果胶酶活性均为阴性。我们得出结论,克雷伯氏菌属的一种与念珠菌属、酿酒酵母属和克勒克酵母属的三种酵母的组合是导致菠萝果实萎蔫症状的原因。菠萝果实萎蔫的症状与先前报道的酵母发酵相似(2,3)。这些报道未考虑酵母与细菌的相互作用。未发现菠萝品种与特定田间地点的病原体之间存在关联。病害爆发似乎与自然发生的果实半透明有关,这是一种与钙、钾和氮平衡相关的生理紊乱(1,3),会增加果实细胞壁水解酶和膜通透性。这种情况会从果实中释放营养物质,有利于微生物生长。据我们所知,这是巴西首次报道与菠萝萎蔫病相关的细菌和酵母组合。关于圣埃斯皮里图州田间萎蔫病流行的病原体信息将有助于育种和病害控制策略。参考文献:(1)R. P. Haff等人,《食品加工与保鲜杂志》30:527,2006年。(2)C. Py等人,《菠萝:栽培与用途》,Larose出版社,巴黎,1987年。(3)K. G. Rohrbach和M. Johnson,《菠萝:植物学、生产与用途》,D. P. Bartholomew等人编,CABI出版社,英国沃灵福德,2003年。