• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故诉讼何去何从?

Whither malpractice litigation?

作者信息

Mills D H

出版信息

West J Med. 1988 Nov;149(5):611-5.

PMID:3074562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1026561/
Abstract

Existing tort reform has produced moderating effects on some states, particularly California. Continued escalation of claims frequency, however, and average paid-claim costs mean that other remedies will have to be sought if the professional liability problem is to be solved. Many sources, including the American Medical Association, have proffered radical changes, but most of these changes will cost more than physicians and hospitals can afford. Therefore, the availability of additional funds will determine the next stage of reform. In the meantime, physicians must become more expert in medical staff peer review if they expect to successfully affect future developments.

摘要

现有的侵权行为改革已对一些州产生了缓和作用,尤其是加利福尼亚州。然而,索赔频率的持续上升以及平均赔付索赔成本意味着,如果要解决职业责任问题,就必须寻求其他补救措施。包括美国医学协会在内的许多机构都提出了激进的变革建议,但这些变革大多成本过高,医生和医院难以承受。因此,额外资金的可获得性将决定改革的下一阶段。与此同时,如果医生期望成功影响未来的发展,他们必须在医务人员同行评审方面变得更加专业。

相似文献

1
Whither malpractice litigation?医疗事故诉讼何去何从?
West J Med. 1988 Nov;149(5):611-5.
2
Tort reform legislation: can it help hospitals?侵权改革立法:它能帮助医院吗?
Hospitals. 1990 May 20;64(10):28-33.
3
Escalating malpractice costs: what's behind them...what preventive procedures can be taken to reduce claims.不断攀升的医疗事故成本:其背后的原因……以及可以采取哪些预防措施来减少索赔。
Med Malpract Cost Containment J. 1979 Apr;1(1):7-26.
4
Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?法定上限:是对医疗事故保险危机的非自愿贡献,还是获得可负担医疗保健的合理机制?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:337-75.
5
Medical liability, product liability, and the question of tort reform.医疗责任、产品责任与侵权法改革问题。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Dec;94(12):1039-49.
6
The impact of the medical malpractice crisis on OB-GYNs and patients in southern New Jersey.医疗事故危机对新泽西州南部妇产科医生和患者的影响。
N J Med. 2003 Sep;100(9):12-9.
7
Impact of state tort reforms on physician malpractice payments.州侵权法改革对医生医疗事故赔偿的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):500-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.500.
8
The malpractice liability crisis, part 2: moving toward workable solutions.医疗事故责任危机,第二部分:迈向可行的解决方案。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Apr;1(4):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.019.
9
Beyond tort reform.超越侵权法改革。
Tex Med. 1997 Sep;93(9):59-65.
10
Why a new malpractice crisis is coming.为何一场新的医疗事故危机即将来临。
Med Econ. 1979 Oct 29;56(22):109-14.

本文引用的文献

1
The frequency and severity of medical malpractice claims: new evidence.医疗事故索赔的频率与严重程度:新证据
Law Contemp Probl. 1986 Spring;49(2):57-84.
2
Medical insurance feasibility study. A technical summary.医疗保险可行性研究。技术总结。
West J Med. 1978 Apr;128(4):360-5.