Suhas Satish, Rao Naren P
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;61(Suppl 1):S30-S36. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_517_18.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating mental illness characterized by an early onset and chronic course. Evidence from several lines of research suggests significant neuropsychological deficits in patients with OCD; executive dysfunction and nonverbal memory deficits have been reported consistently in OCD. These deficits persist despite controlling potential confounders such as comorbidity, severity of illness, and medications. Neuropsychological impairments are independent of illness severity, thus suggesting that the neuropsychological deficits are trait markers of the disease. In addition, these deficits are seen in first-degree relatives of individuals with OCD. These reports suggest that neuropsychological deficits are potential endophenotype markers in OCD. Neuropsychological studies in pediatric OCD are limited; they show impairments of small effect size across multiple domains but with doubtful clinical significance. Preliminary evidence shows that different symptom dimensions of OCD may have unique neuropsychological deficits suggestive of discrete but overlapping neuroanatomical regions for individual symptom dimensions. Overall, neuropsychological deficits further support the role of frontostriatal circuits in the neurobiology of OCD. In addition, emerging literature also suggests the important role of other areas, in particular parietal cortex. Preliminary evidence suggests the possible role of neuropsychological deficits to be markers of treatment response but needs to be examined in future. Longitudinal studies with examination of patients at different time points and examination of their potential utility as predictors of treatment response are needed in future.
强迫症(OCD)是一种使人衰弱的精神疾病,其特征为起病早且病程呈慢性。多项研究的证据表明,强迫症患者存在显著的神经心理学缺陷;强迫症患者持续存在执行功能障碍和非言语记忆缺陷。尽管控制了潜在的混杂因素,如共病、疾病严重程度和药物治疗等,这些缺陷依然存在。神经心理学损害与疾病严重程度无关,因此表明神经心理学缺陷是该疾病的特质标记。此外,在强迫症患者的一级亲属中也观察到了这些缺陷。这些报告表明,神经心理学缺陷可能是强迫症的潜在内表型标记。儿科强迫症的神经心理学研究有限;这些研究显示在多个领域存在效应量较小的损害,但临床意义存疑。初步证据表明,强迫症的不同症状维度可能具有独特的神经心理学缺陷,提示各个症状维度存在离散但重叠的神经解剖区域。总体而言,神经心理学缺陷进一步支持了额纹状体回路在强迫症神经生物学中的作用。此外,新出现的文献也表明其他区域,特别是顶叶皮质,具有重要作用。初步证据表明,神经心理学缺陷可能是治疗反应的标记,但未来需要进一步研究。未来需要进行纵向研究,在不同时间点对患者进行检查,并检验其作为治疗反应预测指标的潜在效用。