Suppr超能文献

PD-1/PD-L1或CTLA4抑制剂联合化疗作为肺癌一线治疗的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shen Kaikai, Cui Jinggang, Wei Yuqing, Chen Xiaojun, Liu Guohua, Gao Xiaolai, Li Wei, Lu Huiling, Zhan Ping, Lv Tangfeng, Lin Dang

机构信息

Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, 16 West BAITA Road, Suzhou 215001, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6636-6652. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.72.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been applied as a first-line treatment for lung cancer, but consistent beneficial results have not been documented. Therefore, our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy to promote its application.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases for studies that estimated the safety and efficacy of combined therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control response (DCR) parameters were evaluated with odds ratio (OR) values of the combination arm over the non-combination arm. Hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the combination and non-combination arms. All treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 3 to 5 TRAEs were expressed as relative risk (RR) values of the combination arm over the non-combination arm.

RESULTS

Ten eligible studies involving 4,887 patients were identified. The pooled ORs for ORR and DCR were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.30-2.63, P<0.01) and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.70-1.86, P<0.01), respectively. The pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.79, P<0.001) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.88, P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, ORR and DCR were significantly improved in the programmed cell death-1/L1 (PD-1/L1) blockade for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) group (subgroup A), with a combined OR values of 2.36 (95% CI: 1.79-3.13, P<0.001) and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.10-3.35, P<0.001), respectively. However, no significant benefits were observed in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blockade for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (subgroup B) and CTLA-4 blockade for NSCLC groups (subgroup C). In addition, a significant improvement in PFS was observed in subgroup A, subgroup B and subgroup C, with pooled HR values of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63, P<0.001), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P<0.05) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00, P<0.05), respectively. Only subgroup A exhibited an OS benefit, with a combined HR value of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55-0.81, P<0.001). Moreover, as the expression of PD-L1 increased, the PFS and OS benefits were more significantly. Furthermore, patients without central nervous system (CNS) metastasis who were treated with PD-1/L1 inhibitors had a longer OS than patients with CNS metastasis (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P<0.001). Finally, combined therapy was associated with 3 to 5 TRAEs (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy in combination exhibited superior in ORR, DCR, PFS and OS as well as slightly increased TRAE levels compared with those of patients treated with either monotherapy.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗已被用作肺癌的一线治疗方法,但尚未有一致的有益结果被记录。因此,我们的荟萃分析旨在评估联合治疗的有效性和安全性,以促进其应用。

方法

我们在电子数据库中搜索评估联合治疗安全性和有效性的研究。通过联合治疗组与非联合治疗组的比值比(OR)值来评估客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)参数。风险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)用于计算联合治疗组和非联合治疗组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。所有治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)以及3至5级TRAEs均表示为联合治疗组相对于非联合治疗组的相对风险(RR)值。

结果

共纳入10项符合条件的研究,涉及4887例患者。ORR和DCR的合并OR分别为1.85(95%CI:1.30 - 2.63,P<0.01)和1.14(95%CI:0.70 - 1.86,P<0.01)。PFS和OS的合并HR分别为0.67(95%CI:0.58 - 0.79,P<0.001)和0.76(95%CI:0.65 - 0.88,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)组(A亚组)程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/配体1(PD - 1/L1)阻断治疗的ORR和DCR显著改善,合并OR值分别为2.36(95%CI:1.79 - 3.13,P<0.001)和1.92(95%CI:1.10 - 3.35,P<0.001)。然而,小细胞肺癌(SCLC)组(B亚组)细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA - 4)阻断治疗和NSCLC组(C亚组)CTLA - 4阻断治疗未观察到显著益处。此外,A亚组、B亚组和C亚组的PFS均有显著改善,合并HR值分别为0.58(95%CI:0.52 - 0.63,P<0.001)、0.86(95%CI:0.76 - 0.97,P<0.05)和0.83(95%CI:0.68 - 1.00,P<0.05)。只有A亚组显示出OS获益,合并HR值为0.67(95%CI:0.55 - 0.81,P<0.001)。此外,随着PD - L1表达增加,PFS和OS获益更显著。此外,接受PD - 1/L1抑制剂治疗且无中枢神经系统(CNS)转移的患者OS长于有CNS转移的患者(HR:0.67,95%CI:0.55 - 0.80,P<0.001)。最后,联合治疗与3至5级TRAEs相关(RR:1.26,95%CI:1.08 - 1.47;P<0.01)。

结论

与单纯接受单一疗法的患者相比,接受免疫疗法和化疗联合治疗的患者在ORR、DCR、PFS和OS方面表现更优,且TRAEs水平略有升高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Immune-associated plasma proteins in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients.口腔和口咽癌患者的免疫相关血浆蛋白
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 27;8(9):e10753. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10753. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Can Soluble Immune Checkpoint Molecules on Exosomes Mediate Inflammation?外泌体上可溶性免疫检查点分子是否能介导炎症反应?
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2022 Dec;17(3-4):381-397. doi: 10.1007/s11481-021-10018-3. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗用于鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity.免疫检查点抑制剂毒性。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Jul 31;20(9):72. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0718-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验