• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。

Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.

机构信息

Infection Services, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Immunology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dky575
PMID:30753497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inaccurate allergy labelling results in inappropriate antimicrobial management of the patient, which may affect clinical outcome, increase the risk of adverse events and increase costs. Inappropriate use of alternative antibiotics has implications for antimicrobial stewardship programmes and microbial resistance.

METHODS

All adult inpatients labelled as penicillin allergic were identified and screened for eligibility by the study pharmacist. An accurate allergy and medication history was taken. Patients were 'de-labelled', underwent oral challenge or were referred to an immunology clinic, if study criteria were met. All patients included in the study were followed-up 1 year after intervention.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty eligible patients with a label of 'penicillin allergy' were identified. The prevalence of reported penicillin allergy at Middlemore Hospital was 11%. We found that 80% of study patients could be 'de-labelled'. Of those, 80% were 'de-labelled' after an interview with the pharmacist alone, 16% had an uneventful oral challenge and 4% were deemed to be inappropriately labelled after referral to an immunology clinic. Appropriately labelled patients accounted for 20% of the study population. Changes to inpatient antibiotic therapy were recommended in 61% of 'de-labelled' patients, of which no patients had adverse events after commencing on penicillin antibiotics. At the 1 year follow-up, 98% of patients who were 'de-labelled' had no adverse events to repeated administration of penicillin antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that a pharmacist-led allergy management service is a safe option to promote antimicrobial stewardship and appropriate allergy labelling.

摘要

背景

不准确的过敏标签结果会导致患者对抗生素的管理不当,这可能会影响临床结果,增加不良事件的风险,并增加成本。替代抗生素的不当使用对抗菌药物管理计划和微生物耐药性有影响。

方法

研究药剂师通过识别和筛选所有被标记为青霉素过敏的成年住院患者来确定其是否符合入选条件。患者接受了准确的过敏和用药史采集。如果符合研究标准,患者将被“去标签化”,进行口服挑战或转至免疫科诊所。所有纳入研究的患者在干预后 1 年内进行随访。

结果

确定了 250 名符合条件的标签为“青霉素过敏”的患者。米德尔莫尔医院报告的青霉素过敏发生率为 11%。我们发现 80%的研究患者可以“去标签化”。其中,80%的患者仅通过与药剂师面谈“去标签化”,16%的患者口服挑战无不良反应,4%的患者经转至免疫科诊所后被认为是标签不当。适当标签的患者占研究人群的 20%。建议对 61%的“去标签化”患者进行住院抗生素治疗的改变,其中开始使用青霉素抗生素后没有患者出现不良事件。在 1 年的随访中,98%的“去标签化”患者重复使用青霉素抗生素后没有不良事件。

结论

这项研究表明,药剂师主导的过敏管理服务是促进抗菌药物管理和适当过敏标签的安全选择。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.
2
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention.评价药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签病房查房:一种新的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jun 1;74(6):1725-1730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz082.
3
Removal of incorrect penicillin allergy labels in a UK hospital.在英国一家医院去除错误的青霉素过敏标签。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Oct;29(10):1338.e1-1338.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
Next step in antibiotic stewardship: Pharmacist-provided penicillin allergy testing.抗生素管理的下一步:药剂师进行青霉素过敏测试。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Aug;42(4):509-512. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12530. Epub 2017 May 14.
5
The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy.消除青霉素过敏标签的挑战。
Allergy. 2020 Feb;75(2):273-288. doi: 10.1111/all.13848. Epub 2019 May 26.
6
The role of a clinical pharmacist in spurious Penicillin allergy: a narrative review.临床药师在青霉素伪过敏反应中的作用:叙事性综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):461-475. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01226-7. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling project within a preoperative assessment clinic: the low-hanging fruit is within reach.药剂师主导的术前评估门诊青霉素过敏去标签项目:低挂的果实触手可及。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Sep;139:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Penicillin allergy skin testing as an antibiotic stewardship intervention reduces alternative antibiotic exposures in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.青霉素过敏皮肤试验作为一种抗生素管理干预措施,可减少造血干细胞移植受者的替代抗生素暴露。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;21(6):e13175. doi: 10.1111/tid.13175. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Safety and efficacy of direct two-step penicillin challenges with an inpatient pharmacist-driven allergy evaluation.住院药师主导的过敏评估下直接两步青霉素挑战的安全性和有效性。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021 Mar 1;42(2):153-159. doi: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.200128.
10
Oral amoxicillin challenge for low-risk penicillin allergic patients.对低风险青霉素过敏患者进行口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/imj.14978. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
International Network of Antibiotic Allergy Nations (iNAAN): Protocol for a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation multicentre prospective cohort and target trial emulation study evaluating penicillin allergy delabeling via direct oral challenge.国际抗生素过敏国家网络(iNAAN):一项2型混合有效性-实施多中心前瞻性队列研究及目标试验模拟研究的方案,该研究通过直接口服激发试验评估青霉素过敏标签去除情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330724. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of a Stepwise Intervention to Improve Nurse-administered Penicillin Allergy Screening and De-labeling in Pediatric Inpatients.评估逐步干预措施以改善儿科住院患者中护士执行的青霉素过敏筛查和脱敏标记
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 14;10(4):e825. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000825. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
3
Unpacking Oral Challenge Protocols: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Study of Reactions, Predictors, and Practices for Delabeling Low-Risk Penicillin Allergies Leveraging Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖析口服激发试验方案:一项利用系统评价和荟萃分析数据对低风险青霉素过敏脱敏反应、预测因素及实践进行的描述性流行病学研究
Hosp Pharm. 2025 May 8:00185787251337626. doi: 10.1177/00185787251337626.
4
An Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge for De-Labelling Low Risk Patients With a Penicillin Allergy Label.对青霉素过敏标签的低风险患者进行脱标签直接口服青霉素激发试验的经济学评估。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 May;55(5):378-390. doi: 10.1111/cea.14633. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Narrative review of recent developments and the future of penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists.非过敏症专科医生对青霉素过敏去标签化的最新进展及未来的叙述性综述。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Jul 10;2(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00035-6.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to delabel low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.一项关于去除低风险青霉素过敏标签干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析,并考虑了性别因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):684-697. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16366. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
7
Exploring Antibacterial Usage and Pathogen Surveillance over Five Years in a Tertiary Referral Teaching Hospital Adult General Intensive Care Unit (ICU).探索一家三级转诊教学医院成人综合重症监护病房(ICU)五年间的抗菌药物使用情况及病原体监测。
Pathogens. 2024 Nov 5;13(11):961. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13110961.
8
Factors influencing implementation and adoption of direct oral penicillin challenge for allergy delabelling: a qualitative evaluation.影响过敏去标签化直接口服青霉素激发试验实施和采用的因素:定性评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Sep 7;13(3):e002890. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002890.
9
True Rate of Allergy among Pediatric Inpatients with Penicillin Allergy Labels (TRIAL).青霉素过敏标签的儿科住院患者中过敏的真实发生率(试验)
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jul 10;77(3):e3531. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3531. eCollection 2024.
10
Management and Implications of Beta-Lactam Allergies.β-内酰胺类过敏的管理及影响
Cureus. 2024 May 14;16(5):e60281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60281. eCollection 2024 May.