• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对低风险青霉素过敏患者进行口服阿莫西林激发试验。

Oral amoxicillin challenge for low-risk penicillin allergic patients.

作者信息

Livirya Silabhakta, Pithie Alan, Chua Ignatius, Hamilton Niall, Doogue Matthew, Isenman Heather

机构信息

General Medicine, Hawke's Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand.

Department of Infectious Diseases, General Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/imj.14978. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1111/imj.14978
PMID:32672891
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penicillin allergy is the most reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Being labelled with 'penicillin allergy' is associated with suboptimal antibiotic therapy and poor patient outcomes. Most labelled with 'penicillin allergy' are at low risk of harm from penicillins and guidelines recommend testing for accurate diagnosis. Although skin testing is recommended to exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reactions, there is limited access in most settings.

AIMS

To evaluate oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing for patients labelled with 'penicillin allergy' assessed as low risk during hospital admission.

METHODS

General Medical inpatients with a 'penicillin allergy' label were assessed. For those who had tolerated a penicillin since the index event, the ADR label was removed. Those assessed as 'low risk' were administered 250 mg amoxicillin orally without prior skin testing. The durability of de-labelling was subsequently assessed by review of clinical records.

RESULTS

Of 224 patients with a history of a penicillin ADR, 162 (72%) were low risk. A further 12 were excluded and of the remaining 150, 56 (37%) had tolerated penicillins since their index reaction and were de-labelled without challenge, 15 (10%) with a non-allergic history were de-labelled. The remaining 79 were offered an oral amoxicillin challenge; 38 declined and 41 tolerated amoxicillin. Overall, 112 of the 224 (50%) patients had their ADR label removed.

CONCLUSIONS

A careful ADR history enables de-labelling of many patients. An oral amoxicillin challenge without prior skin testing is safe and feasible for low-risk penicillin allergic patients while in hospital.

摘要

背景

青霉素过敏是报告最多的药物不良反应(ADR)。被标记为“青霉素过敏”与抗生素治疗欠佳及患者预后不良相关。大多数被标记为“青霉素过敏”的患者使用青霉素产生危害的风险较低,指南建议进行检测以准确诊断。尽管推荐进行皮肤试验以排除免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的反应,但在大多数情况下难以进行。

目的

评估在住院期间被评估为低风险的、标记有“青霉素过敏”的患者在不进行预先皮肤试验的情况下口服阿莫西林激发试验的效果。

方法

对标记有“青霉素过敏”的普通内科住院患者进行评估。对于自索引事件以来耐受青霉素的患者,去除ADR标记。对被评估为“低风险”的患者在不进行预先皮肤试验的情况下口服250mg阿莫西林。随后通过查阅临床记录评估去除标记的持久性。

结果

在224例有青霉素ADR病史的患者中,162例(72%)为低风险。另有12例被排除,在其余150例中,56例(37%)自索引反应以来耐受青霉素,未经激发试验即去除标记,15例(10%)无过敏史的患者被去除标记。其余79例接受口服阿莫西林激发试验;38例拒绝,41例耐受阿莫西林。总体而言,224例患者中有112例(50%)的ADR标记被去除。

结论

仔细询问ADR病史可使许多患者去除标记。对于住院期间低风险的青霉素过敏患者,不进行预先皮肤试验进行口服阿莫西林激发试验是安全可行的。

相似文献

1
Oral amoxicillin challenge for low-risk penicillin allergic patients.对低风险青霉素过敏患者进行口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/imj.14978. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy.在报告有青霉素过敏的成年过敏患者且低风险患者中,不进行初步皮肤试验直接口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
3
Penicillin allergy de-labelling ahead of elective surgery: feasibility and barriers.择期手术前青霉素过敏去标签化:可行性和障碍。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;123(1):e110-e116. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy.改进常规产前青霉素过敏检测以应对报告的青霉素过敏。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859.
5
Inpatient allergy delabeling of pediatric patients with low-risk penicillin allergy status through direct oral amoxicillin challenge.通过直接口服阿莫西林挑战,对低风险青霉素过敏状态的儿科住院患者进行过敏标签剔除。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):61-69. doi: 10.2500/aap.2024.45.230069.
6
Skin testing and oral amoxicillin challenge in the outpatient allergy and clinical immunology clinic in pregnant women with penicillin allergy.在有青霉素过敏史的孕妇的门诊过敏和临床免疫学诊所中进行皮肤试验和口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):646-651. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review.青霉素过敏的评估与管理:综述
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.
8
Diagnosis of penicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalosporin allergy: reliability of examination assessed by skin testing and oral challenge.青霉素、阿莫西林和头孢菌素过敏的诊断:通过皮肤试验和口服激发试验评估检查的可靠性。
J Pediatr. 1998 Jan;132(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70499-8.
9
Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.
10
De-labelling self-reported penicillin allergy within the emergency department through the use of skin tests and oral drug provocation testing.通过皮肤试验和口服药物激发试验在急诊科消除自我报告的青霉素过敏标签。
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Oct;29(5):509-515. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12774. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clearance of penicillin allergies via direct oral provocation testing (DOPT): a systematic review.通过直接口服激发试验(DOPT)清除青霉素过敏:一项系统评价
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 31;5(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10080. eCollection 2025.
2
Unpacking Oral Challenge Protocols: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Study of Reactions, Predictors, and Practices for Delabeling Low-Risk Penicillin Allergies Leveraging Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖析口服激发试验方案:一项利用系统评价和荟萃分析数据对低风险青霉素过敏脱敏反应、预测因素及实践进行的描述性流行病学研究
Hosp Pharm. 2025 May 8:00185787251337626. doi: 10.1177/00185787251337626.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to delabel low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.
一项关于去除低风险青霉素过敏标签干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析,并考虑了性别因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):684-697. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16366. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists: a comparison of testing protocols.非过敏症专科医生对青霉素过敏标签的去除:检测方案比较
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Dec 19;5(6):dlad134. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad134. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center.在一家学术医疗中心,对自我报告有青霉素过敏史的住院患者采用β-内酰胺分级激发流程。
Front Allergy. 2023 Jul 31;4:1161683. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1161683. eCollection 2023.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2023 Jun 26;195(25):E884-E887. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221266-f.
7
Penicillin allergy delabelling of patients at risk of sexually transmitted infections in primary care.基层医疗中对有性传播感染风险患者的青霉素过敏消除标签。
CMAJ. 2023 Mar 27;195(12):E449-E451. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221266.
8
The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非过敏专科医生支持青霉素过敏评估和重新标记成人和儿科患者的干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;129:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
9
Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.改善T细胞介导的药物不良反应诊断与管理的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:923991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991. eCollection 2022.
10
De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study.去标签化青霉素过敏在急性住院患者中的应用:一项试点研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1.