Seow Hsien, Salam-White Lialoma, Bainbridge Daryl
Department of Oncology (Seow, Bainbridge), McMaster University; Escarpment Cancer Research Institute (Seow); Juravinski Cancer Centre (Seow, Bainbridge), Hamilton, Ont.; Brant Community Healthcare System (Salam-White), Brantford, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2019 Feb 11;7(1):E73-E80. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180113. Print 2019 Jan-Mar.
Access to community-based specialist palliative care teams has been shown to improve patients' quality of life; however, the impact on health system expenditures is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether exposure to these teams reduces health system costs compared with usual care.
We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study in Ontario, Canada, using linked administrative data. Decedents treated by 1 of 11 community-based specialist palliative care teams in 2009/10 and 2010/11 (the exposed group) were propensity score matched (comorbidity, extent of home care, etc.) 1 to 1 to similar decedents in usual care (the unexposed group). The teams are comprised of a core group of specialized physicians, nurses and other providers; their role is to manage symptoms around the clock, provide education and coordinate care. Our primary outcome was the overall difference in health system costs (among 5 health care sectors) between all matched pairs of exposed versus unexposed patients in the last 30 days of life.
The total cohort of decedents included 3109 matched pairs. Among matched pairs, the mean health system cost difference was $512 (95% confidence interval [CI] -$641 to -$383) lower in the last 30 days among exposed than among unexposed patients. In the last 30 days, the mean home care costs of the exposed group were $189 higher (95% CI -$151 to $227) than those of the unexposed group, but their mean hospital costs were $733 lower (95% CI -$950 to -$516).
Our study suggests that health system costs are lower for patients who have access to community-based specialist teams than for those who receive usual care alone, largely because of decreased hospital costs. Ensuring access to in-home palliative care support, as provided by these teams, is an efficacious strategy for reducing health care expenditures at the end of life.
已有研究表明,获得社区专科姑息治疗团队的服务可改善患者的生活质量;然而,其对卫生系统支出的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定与常规护理相比,接触这些团队是否能降低卫生系统成本。
我们在加拿大安大略省利用关联的行政数据进行了一项回顾性匹配队列研究。2009/10年和2010/11年由11个社区专科姑息治疗团队之一治疗的死者(暴露组),根据倾向得分(合并症、家庭护理程度等)与常规护理中的类似死者(未暴露组)进行1:1匹配。这些团队由一组核心的专科医生、护士和其他提供者组成;他们的职责是全天候管理症状、提供教育并协调护理。我们的主要结局是在生命的最后30天内,所有匹配的暴露组与未暴露组患者之间(在5个卫生保健部门中)卫生系统成本的总体差异。
死者总队列包括3109对匹配病例。在匹配对中,暴露组在生命的最后30天内的平均卫生系统成本差异比未暴露组低512美元(95%置信区间[CI] -641美元至-383美元)。在生命的最后30天内,暴露组的平均家庭护理成本比未暴露组高189美元(95%CI -151美元至227美元),但其平均住院成本低733美元(95%CI -950美元至-516美元)。
我们的研究表明,获得社区专科团队服务的患者的卫生系统成本低于仅接受常规护理的患者,这主要是因为住院成本降低。确保获得这些团队提供的家庭姑息治疗支持是降低临终医疗保健支出的有效策略。