Suppr超能文献

经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗后消化性溃疡中使用 vonoprazan 与质子泵抑制剂的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of the Use of Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Peptic Ulcers Resulting from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Naval Clinical Medicine Grade 2014, Basic Medical College, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

Department of Emergency Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2019 Feb 13;25:1169-1176. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911886.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Currently, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for ulcers resulting from endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Vonoprazan is a new oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers resulting from ESD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Published results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of ulcers resulting from ESD were identified up to March 2018. The main clinical endpoints evaluated were healing rate and adverse events. The meta-analysis included quality assessment of the studies, statistical analysis of endpoints, and sensitivity analysis using Revman version 5.3 meta-analysis software. RESULTS Systematic literature review identified seven published studies that included 548 patients. Five studies were published as full-text manuscripts, and two studies were published as abstracts. Meta-analysis of the vonoprazan treatment, compared with PPI treatment, for ESD showed that the pooled relative risk (RR) of healing rate was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.33-1.22) for the 4-week study group and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.15) for the 8-week study group. The RR for adverse events was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.31-1.38) (P>0.05). No statistical evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of vonoprazan was comparable with PPIs for the treatment of peptic ulcers following ESD. Further studies are required to support the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan compared with different types of PPIs.

摘要

背景

目前质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后溃疡的一线治疗药物。沃诺拉赞是一种新型的口服钾竞争酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较沃诺拉赞与 PPI 治疗 ESD 后消化性溃疡的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

材料与方法

截至 2018 年 3 月,检索并比较了沃诺拉赞与 PPI 治疗 ESD 后溃疡的随机对照试验(RCT)的研究结果。主要临床终点评估为愈合率和不良事件。采用 Revman 版本 5.3 荟萃分析软件进行研究质量评估、终点统计分析和敏感性分析。

结果

系统文献回顾确定了 7 项已发表的研究,共纳入 548 例患者。5 项研究为全文发表,2 项研究为摘要发表。沃诺拉赞治疗 ESD 的荟萃分析结果显示,4 周研究组和 8 周研究组的愈合率的合并相对风险(RR)分别为 0.64(95%CI,0.33-1.22)和 0.98(95%CI,0.84-1.15)。不良事件的 RR 为 0.65(95%CI,0.31-1.38)(P>0.05)。未发现发表偏倚的统计学证据。

结论

系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,沃诺拉赞治疗 ESD 后消化性溃疡的疗效与 PPI 相当。需要进一步的研究来支持沃诺拉赞与不同类型的 PPI 相比的安全性和疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b551/6381807/145bd511e343/medscimonit-25-1169-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验