K.G. Jebsen Centre for Influenza Vaccine Research, Institute of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0372, Norway.
Centre for Immune Regulation, Institute of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0372, Norway.
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9(1):1820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38080-7.
Fusing antigens to chemokines to target antigen presenting cells (APC) is a promising method for enhancing immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. However, it is unclear how different chemokines compare in terms of immune potentiating effects. Here we compare Ccl3- and Xcl1-fusion vaccines containing hemagglutinin (HA) from influenza A delivered by intramuscular (i.m.) or intradermal (i.d.) DNA vaccination. Xcl1 fusion vaccines target cDC1s, and enhance proliferation of CD4 and CD8 T cells in vitro. In contrast, Ccl3 target both cDC1 and cDC2, but only enhance CD4 T cell proliferation in combination with cDC2. When Ccl3- or Xcl1-HA fusion vaccines were administered by i.m. DNA immunization, both vaccines induced Th1-polarized immune responses with antibodies of the IgG2a/IgG2b subclass and IFNγ-secreting T cells. After i.d. DNA vaccination, however, only Xcl1-HA maintained a Th1 polarized response and induced even higher numbers of IFNγ-secreting T cells. Consequently, Xcl1-HA induced superior protection against influenza infection compared to Ccl3-HA after i.d. immunization. Interestingly, i.m. immunization with Ccl3-HA induced the strongest overall in vivo cytotoxicity, despite not inducing OT-I proliferation in vitro. In summary, our results highlight important differences between Ccl3- and Xcl1- targeted DNA vaccines suggesting that chemokine fusion vaccines can be tailor-made for different diseases.
将抗原融合到趋化因子中以靶向抗原呈递细胞(APC)是增强 DNA 疫苗免疫原性的一种很有前途的方法。然而,不同趋化因子在增强免疫效果方面的比较尚不清楚。在这里,我们比较了通过肌肉内(i.m.)或皮内(i.d.)DNA 疫苗接种递送的甲型流感血凝素(HA)融合的 Ccl3-和 Xcl1-疫苗。Xcl1 融合疫苗靶向 cDC1,并且增强体外 CD4 和 CD8 T 细胞的增殖。相比之下,Ccl3 既靶向 cDC1 又靶向 cDC2,但仅与 cDC2 结合时才增强 CD4 T 细胞的增殖。当 Ccl3-或 Xcl1-HA 融合疫苗通过 i.m. DNA 免疫接种时,两种疫苗都诱导了 Th1 极化的免疫应答,产生 IgG2a/IgG2b 亚类的抗体和 IFNγ 分泌的 T 细胞。然而,在 i.d. DNA 疫苗接种后,只有 Xcl1-HA 保持 Th1 极化的反应,并诱导更高数量的 IFNγ 分泌的 T 细胞。因此,与 i.d. 免疫接种后的 Ccl3-HA 相比,Xcl1-HA 诱导了对流感感染的更好保护。有趣的是,尽管 Ccl3-HA 的 i.m. 免疫接种在体外没有诱导 OT-I 增殖,但它诱导了最强的整体体内细胞毒性。总之,我们的结果突出了 Ccl3-和 Xcl1-靶向 DNA 疫苗之间的重要差异,表明趋化因子融合疫苗可以针对不同的疾病进行定制。