Clarke Toni-Kim, Zeng Yanni, Navrady Lauren, Xia Charley, Haley Chris, Campbell Archie, Navarro Pau, Amador Carmen, Adams Mark J, Howard David M, Soler Aleix, Hayward Caroline, Thomson Pippa A, Smith Blair H, Padmanabhan Sandosh, Hocking Lynne J, Hall Lynsey S, Porteous David J, Deary Ian J, McIntosh Andrew M
Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF, UK.
Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jan 14;3:11. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13893.2. eCollection 2018.
Stressful life events (SLEs) and neuroticism are risk factors for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, SLEs and neuroticism are heritable and genetic risk for SLEs is associated with risk for MDD. We sought to investigate the genetic and environmental contributions to SLEs in a family-based sample, and quantify genetic overlap with MDD and neuroticism. A subset of Generation Scotland: the Scottish Family Health Study (GS), consisting of 9618 individuals with information on MDD, past 6 month SLEs, neuroticism and genome-wide genotype data was used in the present study. We estimated the heritability of SLEs using GCTA software. The environmental contribution to SLEs was assessed by modelling familial, couple and sibling components. Using polygenic risk scores (PRS) and LD score regression (LDSC) we analysed the genetic overlap between MDD, neuroticism and SLEs. Past 6-month life events were positively associated with lifetime MDD status (β=0.21, r =1.1%, p=2.5 x 10 ) and neuroticism (β =0.13, r =1.9%, p=1.04 x 10 ) at the phenotypic level. Common SNPs explained 8% of the phenotypic variance in personal life events (those directly affecting the individual) (S.E.=0.03, p= 9 x 10 ). A significant effect of couple environment was detected accounting for 13% (S.E.=0.03, p=0.016) of the phenotypic variation in SLEs. PRS analyses found that reporting more SLEs was associated with a higher polygenic risk for MDD (β =0.05, r =0.3%, p=3 x 10 ), but not a higher polygenic risk for neuroticism. LDSC showed a significant genetic correlation between SLEs and both MDD (r =0.33, S.E.=0.08 ) and neuroticism (r =0.15, S.E.=0.07). These findings suggest that SLEs should not be regarded solely as environmental risk factors for MDD as they are partially heritable and this heritability is shared with risk for MDD and neuroticism. Further work is needed to determine the causal direction and source of these associations.
应激性生活事件(SLEs)和神经质是重度抑郁症(MDD)的危险因素。然而,SLEs和神经质具有遗传性,且SLEs的遗传风险与MDD的风险相关。我们试图在一个基于家庭的样本中研究SLEs的遗传和环境因素,并量化与MDD和神经质的遗传重叠。本研究使用了苏格兰世代研究:苏格兰家庭健康研究(GS)的一个子集,该子集由9618名个体组成,他们有关于MDD、过去6个月的SLEs、神经质和全基因组基因型数据的信息。我们使用GCTA软件估计SLEs的遗传力。通过对家庭、配偶和兄弟姐妹成分进行建模来评估SLEs的环境因素。使用多基因风险评分(PRS)和连锁不平衡评分回归(LDSC),我们分析了MDD、神经质和SLEs之间的遗传重叠。在表型水平上,过去6个月的生活事件与终生MDD状态(β=0.21,r =1.1%,p=2.5×10)和神经质(β =0.13,r =1.9%,p=1.04×10)呈正相关。常见单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)解释了个人生活事件(直接影响个体的事件)中8%的表型变异(标准误=0.03,p=9×10)。检测到配偶环境有显著影响,占SLEs表型变异的13%(标准误=0.03,p=0.016)。PRS分析发现,报告更多的SLEs与MDD的多基因风险较高相关(β =0.05,r =0.3%,p=3×10),但与神经质的多基因风险较高无关。LDSC显示SLEs与MDD(r =0.33,标准误=0.08)和神经质(r =0.15,标准误=0.07)之间存在显著的遗传相关性。这些发现表明,SLEs不应仅被视为MDD的环境危险因素,因为它们部分具有遗传性,且这种遗传性与MDD和神经质的风险是共享的。需要进一步的研究来确定这些关联的因果方向和来源。